Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Prelude vs. RSX-S

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 18, 2005 | 08:00 PM
  #1  
MonStar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: Hockessin
Default Prelude vs. RSX-S

I know that they're both 200 HP FWD Hondas, and how everything looks on paper. I'm curious about people who have driven them both and how you feel about both.

Obviously the RSX-S responds well to bolt-ons but then again a Prelude with a JRSC for $3K can produce some pretty damn impressive numbers, too.

And keep in mind a 1997-1998 Prelude is $10K or so.

Just trying to get an honest comparison of the 2.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2005 | 09:38 PM
  #2  
VTEC_Junkie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 1
From: Berkeley
Default

the prelude feels more solid and refined. even though the peak hp for both is 200hp, there is a difference in torque and you can definitely feel it in daily driving. if you plan on modding, you might as well get a lude for less and spend the extra money you save on mods.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 07:16 AM
  #3  
MonStar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: Hockessin
Default

Thanks bro, thats what I thought. I am a former 1997 Prelude owner and this is exactly the kind of response I figured. Thanks again, dude.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 07:20 AM
  #4  
watermelonman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
From: wishing I was in -
Default

I wanted to buy a Prelude of one of the last few years, but the price was so high in 2003. I ended up with the RSX because it was only about 2k more, which I figured to be worth it for a brand new car.

That last generation of Preludes will always be one of my favorite cars.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 11:23 AM
  #5  
Christople's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,881
Likes: 0
From: Corn Country
Default

Go with the RSX, better interior, lighter on it's feet, better MPG.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 11:29 AM
  #6  
tuj's Avatar
tuj
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

The chassis of the RSX is significantly better than the Prelude. The K20 is also an amazing motor, and sees quite large gains from IHE + cams + ECU.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 12:16 PM
  #7  
steven975's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 6
From: Vienna, VA
Default

i would vote on the RSX. The 'lude is a nice car, but the H22A was always a "bastard child" to the B18C as far as mods go. the market has moved to the K20, which is probably the best 4-cylinder engine ever made, at least if you don't count the F20C, hehe. BTW, the two are so closely related it's not even funny.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 12:31 PM
  #8  
jasonw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 16,702
Likes: 0
From: █ SF, CA █
Default

I never really thought of the Prelude as competition to the Integra in terms of performance, much less an RSX. It weighs almost 500 lbs more than the Integra! You need to keep that in mind when comparing HP.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 12:45 PM
  #9  
Slamnasty's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,535
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Default

I think the Prelude looks better than the 1G-A RSX-S, but the 1G-B RSX-S makes up for it big time.

The Prelude was voted several times as the best-handling car under $30k, so I would think it would be about even with a current RSX-S...unless FWD cars in the last 4 years have changed that much.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 12:49 PM
  #10  
jasonw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 16,702
Likes: 0
From: █ SF, CA █
Default

Originally Posted by Slamnasty,Sep 19 2005, 01:45 PM
The Prelude was voted several times as the best-handling car under $30k, so I would think it would be about even with a current RSX-S...unless FWD cars in the last 4 years have changed that much.


Was that EXCEPT for the Integra Type R? I've never heard of such a vote...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:01 PM.