Rendition of Insight?
Mike- I just want a clutch, I just want a clutch, I just want a clutch...
And, if I can't have that, then I could live with a semi-manual/auto with paddle shifters, sort of BMW SMG like, but a straight CVT like what is the only Civic hybrid tranny choice would kill me.
Honestly, I know squat about diesel, I'm not sure why I would want one of those over the normal gas + IMA.
And, if I can't have that, then I could live with a semi-manual/auto with paddle shifters, sort of BMW SMG like, but a straight CVT like what is the only Civic hybrid tranny choice would kill me.
Honestly, I know squat about diesel, I'm not sure why I would want one of those over the normal gas + IMA.
Originally Posted by Onehots2k,Aug 11 2008, 03:07 PM
H, the fit is the only way to go if you want a clutch.
Don't get me wrong, I like the Fit, but no f'ing way am I buying a 4-door, I'm totally into all things CRX, and although this new car is called CR-Z, it ain't fooling me for a second, it is a 3rd Gen CRX, And As I have owned an '87 Si and still have my '90 Si, I must have this, the Fit is not the right fit for me.
Originally Posted by Triple-H,Aug 11 2008, 03:04 PM
Mike- I just want a clutch, I just want a clutch, I just want a clutch...
And, if I can't have that, then I could live with a semi-manual/auto with paddle shifters, sort of BMW SMG like, but a straight CVT like what is the only Civic hybrid tranny choice would kill me.
Honestly, I know squat about diesel, I'm not sure why I would want one of those over the normal gas + IMA.
And, if I can't have that, then I could live with a semi-manual/auto with paddle shifters, sort of BMW SMG like, but a straight CVT like what is the only Civic hybrid tranny choice would kill me.
Honestly, I know squat about diesel, I'm not sure why I would want one of those over the normal gas + IMA.
Ok, I can see where 360 ft-lbs could be a lot of fun.... So is this the deal, diesels are typically high in torque for the size of the engine?
Still, all in all, the rumored CR-Z specs ain't too bad, considering 66 mpg. 1.3 I4, 118 hp, 268 ft-lbs.
Damn it man, just tell me it won't ONLY have a CVT tranny...
Still, all in all, the rumored CR-Z specs ain't too bad, considering 66 mpg. 1.3 I4, 118 hp, 268 ft-lbs.
Damn it man, just tell me it won't ONLY have a CVT tranny...
Originally Posted by Triple-H,Aug 12 2008, 05:21 AM
Damn it man, just tell me it won't ONLY have a CVT tranny... 

Honestly, you will never see Honda make a manual IMA system EVER again. The last time Honda did the Insight/Civic hybrid manuals, they had battery problems. Because the battery could be forced/abused by the driver to work over time... you know, put it in taller gear and let the electric motor do the acceleration... instead of ICE.
Originally Posted by Onehots2k,Aug 12 2008, 11:42 AM
where is the 248lb of tq coming from? I wonder how much torque the Honda GSH/Hybrid will have.
Electric motors have not only huge torque, but they have all their torque as soon as they are turned on.
Originally Posted by marthafokker,Aug 12 2008, 11:08 AM
Honestly, you will never see Honda make a manual IMA system EVER again. The last time Honda did the Insight/Civic hybrid manuals, they had battery problems. Because the battery could be forced/abused by the driver to work over time... you know, put it in taller gear and let the electric motor do the acceleration... instead of ICE.
I could live with this though, a manual shift auto, ala BMW SMG.


Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
S2KNJ
New York - Metro New York S2000 Owners
11
May 27, 2009 12:53 AM



