Ring times
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,729
Likes: 8
Ring times
Ring times with refs
I thought this was a useful read.
for the RS4 being faster than Roehl in a 997 C2S... 7:58 is fast for a sedan....
I thought this was a useful read.
for the RS4 being faster than Roehl in a 997 C2S... 7:58 is fast for a sedan....
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
for the RS4 being faster than Roehl in a 997 C2S... 7:58 is fast for a sedan....
How reputable is the 7:58 time for RS4? Was this with a stock car and what tyres?
Sports Auto maanged 8:08 out of a stock RS4, and around 8:05 from the new 911s (ie. 997). So they're not far of each other in terms of times here.
ps. The Veyron time is fabricated. As I have that issue of Wheels magazine and the jurnos were just speculating that it should be capable of 7:40 ... that's all. I don't think it's been tested there (for a time) yet. At least not that I know.
How reputable is the 7:58 time for RS4? Was this with a stock car and what tyres?
Sports Auto maanged 8:08 out of a stock RS4, and around 8:05 from the new 911s (ie. 997). So they're not far of each other in terms of times here.
ps. The Veyron time is fabricated. As I have that issue of Wheels magazine and the jurnos were just speculating that it should be capable of 7:40 ... that's all. I don't think it's been tested there (for a time) yet. At least not that I know.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
From: bobville
Originally Posted by CKit,May 9 2007, 09:45 PM
Ring times with refs
I thought this was a useful read.
for the RS4 being faster than Roehl in a 997 C2S... 7:58 is fast for a sedan....
I thought this was a useful read.
for the RS4 being faster than Roehl in a 997 C2S... 7:58 is fast for a sedan....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post