Hey, here is another style of headlight!!
And the RSX type R is even lighter than S 2000 !!
Is DC5 has more potential than F20C (TO MOD.)-(220hp vs 240hp)?!

 

I prefer the S2000. This to me looks too much like the cars that the 'kids' around here get and modify. Doesn't appeal to me at all, but that's why they make many different cars.

John N

 

I test drove a type s today. The VTEC seems to kick in at about 7000rpm. it did not seen that quick. I was shift right at the red line, and the tires sqeek. The shifter was very smooth, but long throws. The small speedo and tach was hard to read. (I got use to our s2000's). My one big compliant was the lack of an arm rest.

 

I'm sure Integra/RSX owners would obviously agree with you. But we're talking about a car in a completely different class. I still think the new R will set the standard in its class.

 

I've never met a FWD car that looked aggressive. It's about as aggressive as a Hyundai Tiburon

 

Still FWD- cant compare to rear wheel drive, dont like the look of it at all- tooo japanizishh if you know what i mean we have a TypeR version here in OZ which is basically a Type S - test drove it last week and its nothing to rave about

 

No, I think the S2K looks much more aggressive. Just look at the front of our cars, they look like snakes.

 

It's two different types of aggressiveness. The s2k has a aggressive yet clean body lines, especially the front. The Rsx looks aggressive like a new Celica. Either you like it or don't. Clean body lines are much preferred over aggressive. I like Integras, but no way in Hell, do I have any regrets with my s2k. The Rsx is aimed toward the younger generation where they are looking for the aggresive, riced look. The s2k looks more sporty, classy, get a lot of looks kinda car. Both are excellent cars.

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Ap1 type-V
[B]Guys, do u think RSX type R looks more aggressive than S 2000?!

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by jnmunsey
[B]Don't like the headlights?