Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Sad but inspiring..

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 29, 2012 | 01:28 AM
  #11  
nofearofdanger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Default

Epic...
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2012 | 01:42 AM
  #12  
NuncoStr8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by liquid_helix136
... Those rules are lame, and it was a pretty sad vid.. until he rode off gay ninja style on the scooter, then I lol'd
LeMans is an endurance race, so the "no outside help" rule is not lame, it's fundamental.

The race has always intended to separate cars that are fast for two hours from those that are fast as long as you care to race. What really happens is cars compete for two hours but are built to compete at LeMans. Which is the intent - "car racing" is most relevant when the racers are driving actual cars.

LeMans is intentionally different than formula races. Even prototypes have to provide room for a passenger but will never, ever, carry one. LeMans is a car race, not a racecar competition a la Grand Prix racing. By conscious intent.

The prototype class lets manufacturers exercise new technology, and there is always an exhibition spot reserved for something that just doesn't fit but deserves exposure. In between you have the World Cup of race teams. It's not just about the car, the brand, or the drivers. It's about the sum of the parts. Drivers who know not to stress the car, a pit team that can function around the clock, a car that can survive on the same trans, motor, diff, oil, just needs brake and rubber swaps. Luck is huge, but drivers that can be fast without breaking the car are gold.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2012 | 06:04 AM
  #13  
zdave87's Avatar
Member
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 82,468
Likes: 1,193
Default

Originally Posted by NuncoStr8
Originally Posted by Slithr' timestamp='1340388168' post='21803599
... The car took a pretty tough shot into the wall. Who knows what would have been torn off had it been more traditional in terms of layout.

...
I agree that it's cool to see interesting designs on the racetrack.

However, the DeltaWing car hit the wall and broke. That's something a car of any design is capable of

The only reason it was running at LeMans is they reserve a spot for a non-compliant car to race, demonstrating new technology or design. Given the primary, consistent requirement in LeMans is all cars must have space for a passenger, the DeltaWing car was never designed to run in that environment. It was simply a marketing opportunity for Nissan.

Not finishing LeMans is normal so I'm not writing off the DeltaWing as a failure, but in order to be a successful racecar it has to have competition. And as capable as the car may be, it's got nowhere to compete.
Not true according to Don Panoz.
He hopes the DeltaWing will race in more of the 2012 World Endurance Championship events. This will be decided by the FIA and the ACO (the Le Mans organizing body), but the odds are strongly in its favor that the car will see the track again this year. Additionally, Nissan sells a lot of cars in Japan and Brazil, and both have WEC races later this year.


“The car will race at Petit Le Mans in October,” Panoz says. “We hope in 2013 it will be eligible to race as both a LMP1 and a LMP2 car. Of course regulations need to be written, similar to those when the diesel-powered cars [Audi and Peugeot] entered sports-car racing.” He also said the DeltaWing could become the spec car for the LMPC class in American Le Mans Series in 2014.


Panoz reflected on how quickly endurance racing is changing. “A couple of years ago, everyone said the front tires needed to be as wide as the rear tires on a prototype. With the DeltaWing,” he continued, “we have proven that a car with a fraction of the size of the conventional thinking, that has half the mass, half the power and a brilliant design can compete. This is the truly green racing.”


He concluded with this statement: “When people ask me why I got involved with the DeltaWing, my response is simply 'Why not?'
*autoweek.com
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2012 | 07:24 AM
  #14  
rockville's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto
Default

The irony of Panoz's statement about tire widths is one of the reason his front engined racers worked so well is because the rules basically gave the cars more front tire than needed but not enough back tire. So moving weight forward (ie front engine) was good for the cars back then because it better balanced the loads on the tires they were allowed.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2012 | 09:46 AM
  #15  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,735
Likes: 247
Default

This car has a 25F/75R weight distribution, for those that didn't know!
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2012 | 09:47 AM
  #16  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,735
Likes: 247
Default

This car has a 25F/75R weight distribution, for those that didn't know!
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2012 | 01:14 AM
  #17  
NuncoStr8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by zdave87
Originally Posted by NuncoStr8' timestamp='1340484217' post='21806001
[quote name='Slithr' timestamp='1340388168' post='21803599']
... The car took a pretty tough shot into the wall. Who knows what would have been torn off had it been more traditional in terms of layout.

...
I agree that it's cool to see interesting designs on the racetrack.

However, the DeltaWing car hit the wall and broke. That's something a car of any design is capable of

The only reason it was running at LeMans is they reserve a spot for a non-compliant car to race, demonstrating new technology or design. Given the primary, consistent requirement in LeMans is all cars must have space for a passenger, the DeltaWing car was never designed to run in that environment. It was simply a marketing opportunity for Nissan.

Not finishing LeMans is normal so I'm not writing off the DeltaWing as a failure, but in order to be a successful racecar it has to have competition. And as capable as the car may be, it's got nowhere to compete.
Not true according to Don Panoz.
He hopes the DeltaWing will race in more of the 2012 World Endurance Championship events. This will be decided by the FIA and the ACO (the Le Mans organizing body), but the odds are strongly in its favor that the car will see the track again this year. Additionally, Nissan sells a lot of cars in Japan and Brazil, and both have WEC races later this year.


“The car will race at Petit Le Mans in October,” Panoz says. “We hope in 2013 it will be eligible to race as both a LMP1 and a LMP2 car. Of course regulations need to be written, similar to those when the diesel-powered cars [Audi and Peugeot] entered sports-car racing.” He also said the DeltaWing could become the spec car for the LMPC class in American Le Mans Series in 2014.


Panoz reflected on how quickly endurance racing is changing. “A couple of years ago, everyone said the front tires needed to be as wide as the rear tires on a prototype. With the DeltaWing,” he continued, “we have proven that a car with a fraction of the size of the conventional thinking, that has half the mass, half the power and a brilliant design can compete. This is the truly green racing.”


He concluded with this statement: “When people ask me why I got involved with the DeltaWing, my response is simply 'Why not?'
*autoweek.com
[/quote]

What part of my post isn't true?
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2012 | 04:13 PM
  #18  
liquid_helix136's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,289
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by NuncoStr8
Originally Posted by liquid_helix136' timestamp='1340956779' post='21820921
... Those rules are lame, and it was a pretty sad vid.. until he rode off gay ninja style on the scooter, then I lol'd
LeMans is an endurance race, so the "no outside help" rule is not lame, it's fundamental.

The race has always intended to separate cars that are fast for two hours from those that are fast as long as you care to race. What really happens is cars compete for two hours but are built to compete at LeMans. Which is the intent - "car racing" is most relevant when the racers are driving actual cars.

LeMans is intentionally different than formula races. Even prototypes have to provide room for a passenger but will never, ever, carry one. LeMans is a car race, not a racecar competition a la Grand Prix racing. By conscious intent.

The prototype class lets manufacturers exercise new technology, and there is always an exhibition spot reserved for something that just doesn't fit but deserves exposure. In between you have the World Cup of race teams. It's not just about the car, the brand, or the drivers. It's about the sum of the parts. Drivers who know not to stress the car, a pit team that can function around the clock, a car that can survive on the same trans, motor, diff, oil, just needs brake and rubber swaps. Luck is huge, but drivers that can be fast without breaking the car are gold.

Makes sense then, thanks for the explanation
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
austincrx
Car and Bike Talk
34
Sep 30, 2014 06:05 AM
nissanfanatic
S2000 Racing and Competition
14
Mar 2, 2012 06:29 AM
chris_barry
Australia & New Zealand S2000 Owners
1
Mar 10, 2011 10:38 PM
j8mie
Car Talk - Non S2000
2
Oct 10, 2007 03:49 AM
Infinic
S2000 Racing and Competition
0
May 11, 2004 12:28 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:48 AM.