Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Tesla

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 08:33 PM
  #1  
tritium_pie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,543
Likes: 0
From: Vegas baby!!
Default Tesla

if I find out this car has handling that is on-par with say, the Elise or S2000... I just may have found the next toy I'll be buying.

0 to 60 in >4 seconds is nice too.

http://www.dpccars.com/car-movies/10-04-06...la-Roadster.htm

(something tells me though that the weight of the batteries probably gives this car less-than-ideal cornering abilities... but that's pure speculation on my part)
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 09:38 PM
  #2  
Lice Locket's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,976
Likes: 1
Default

The chassis is designed by Lotus, so I have faith it'll handle really well.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2006 | 01:11 AM
  #3  
marthafokker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 0
Default

This thing is $100k.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2006 | 03:14 AM
  #4  
Hawkstrike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Near Motown
Default

Windingroad.com has a review in this month's edition.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2006 | 04:17 AM
  #5  
VTEC_Junkie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 1
From: Berkeley
Default

the fact that they try to market this car as zero emission is BS. there may be no emission coming out of the tailpipe (or lack thereof), but the electrical powerplant that produces the electricity for the car may most likely produce emission of some level.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2006 | 06:37 AM
  #6  
ccarnel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,830
Likes: 0
From: Johnson City
Default

^yes but probably less emissions than what comes out the tailpipe of an automobile/mile.

It's much easier for the government to regulate power plant emissions than tailpipe emissions, not to mention the Natural Gas turbines/ hydroelectric power/ nuclear power plant... is far more efficient than any piston driven automobile engine. Last I remember even the best automotive engines barely realize 20% efficiency.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2006 | 07:13 AM
  #7  
vader1's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,949
Likes: 473
From: MAHT-O-MEDI
Default

Originally Posted by ccarnel,Oct 6 2006, 08:37 AM
^yes but probably less emissions than what comes out the tailpipe of an automobile/mile.

It's much easier for the government to regulate power plant emissions than tailpipe emissions, not to mention the Natural Gas turbines/ hydroelectric power/ nuclear power plant... is far more efficient than any piston driven automobile engine. Last I remember even the best automotive engines barely realize 20% efficiency.
Correct.

I don't think the wieght will hurt it that much either, it is still less than the S2000.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2006 | 07:16 AM
  #8  
cdelena's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,210
Likes: 7
From: WA
Default

Originally Posted by ccarnel,Oct 6 2006, 09:37 AM
^yes but probably less emissions than what comes out the tailpipe of an automobile/mile.

It's much easier for the government to regulate power plant emissions than tailpipe emissions, not to mention the Natural Gas turbines/ hydroelectric power/ nuclear power plant... is far more efficient than any piston driven automobile engine. Last I remember even the best automotive engines barely realize 20% efficiency.
The majority of power in this country comes from coal, and as efficient as power generation may be there are huge transmission losses. So unless you are charging next door to a hydroelectric plant it is not near as clean a deal as you may think. Not to say that electric vehicles are bad, they may one day be the backbone of transportation, but we need to be fully knowledgeable about what we are being sold.

A true zero emissions auto would be magic.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2006 | 07:19 AM
  #9  
dogas's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Default

I believe this car has the potential to change the auto industry. It is the first good looking, high performance electric car with a long range. They are using this car to fund production of cheaper, more accessible electric cars.

It's not going to be immediate, but over the next 5-10 years. If this car (and subsequent Tesla cars) are a hit (and I believe they will be), expect to see a lot more electric cars on the road. Some manufacturers will take advantage sooner than others, and they will be ahead of the curve. Other manufacturers will have to play catchup.

Why do I have the feeling that Japanese auto makers will jump on this first?
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2006 | 07:20 AM
  #10  
CG's Avatar
CG
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,029
Likes: 2
From: In the heart of the USSA!
Default

Is the Tesla one of the cars using some version of laptop batteries? Do I have it confused with another car? With all the recent laptop battery fires I wonder if it's a concern.

I really like the idea of the car if everything works as it should.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:39 PM.