Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Why are the Big 3 afraid of reality?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 11:58 AM
  #11  
TommyDeVito's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,359
Likes: 490
Default

Originally Posted by xmatt' date='Jan 5 2009, 12:46 PM

I think Honda's viewpoint is that small displacement, low-torque engines allow them to make the best possible cars for people's real needs, at the most competitive price.
IE boring!
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 11:59 AM
  #12  
xmatt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by TommyDeVito' date='Jan 5 2009, 02:58 PM
IE boring!
For some enthusiasts, yes. For the majority of people buying cars, I don't think they even know what torque is.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 12:09 PM
  #13  
ahrmike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,531
Likes: 0
Default

This is/was a case study for my Engineering Design class.

Apparently its not the design/function/blahblah blah.

in the end, its the automakers (gm,chrysler,ford) NOT doing enough during the planning phase. this is why all the products came out CRAPPY. They had a slow design process that was never really 'done' til after the car was in production, thats why there was/is a lot of recalls, lots of common stupid problems that shouldnt be there.

Japanese automakers on the other hand, would spend many times the manhours to design+model the car. It would also be a faster process since more people would work on the design. Faster design->production time = better stuff in the market.

+ america needs 'torque' since we haul a lot of fat around ;D

I think the big three, if they come out of this alive...will become a better company. Im glad they're finally coming to terms w. reality.

+the unions have to back off a little.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 12:11 PM
  #14  
ahrmike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,531
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WarrenW' date='Jan 5 2009, 10:35 AM
I have been wondering if one of the reasons why Honda engines are so reliable might actually be due to less torque. I mean, would a lot of torque actually put more wear and tear on the engine components after a while (bearings, con rods, valves, rocker arms, etc.) than an engine with the same HP but less torque?

Any mechanical Engineers want to chime in on this?

Warren
I have heard from my ME teacher that the toyota plant that he visited (in N.am) was SPOTLESS. He said he commented on this to the manager at the plant, and the manager said something along the lines of cleaner enviroment for workers = workers caring more + cleaner work done...

IDK how the american automaker plants are.


i guess it helps the japanese plants = newer.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 12:15 PM
  #15  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

[quote name='xmatt' date='Jan 5 2009, 04:55 PM'] Let me mention what I think is a good example of what they do wrong:
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 12:18 PM
  #16  
QUIKAG's Avatar
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 9,510
Likes: 478
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by GPMike' date='Jan 5 2009, 12:22 PM
For decades the imports have been eating their market share, mostly with weak, underpowered cars during the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s and 2000s....so much so Toyota is now #1. Most import manufacturers have been building plants here while the Big 3 have been closing their's.

My question is....because you know...Honda doesn't produce vehicles with lots of power and torque yet they are very successful (same can be said for Toyota outside of their truck line), but some here would lead you to believe that torque and horsepower are the be all end all. If torque and horsepower are the be all end all...why is GM, Ford and Chrysler...with torque and power monsters up and down the line doing so poorly? I R CONFUZED.


PS....this gets edited or locked...you are a Nazi. This is a serious car talk question.
I really hit a button with you, didn't I? For someone who proclaims to be the end all/be all of finance and a former Big 4 audit master who rubs elbows with multi-quazillionaires, you really should have more important things to do with your time.

You can talk all the crap you want about how bad the Big 3 are doing, but the FACT of the matter is, there are WAY more vehicles I would buy with my own money from GM/Ford than I would from Honda/Toyota.

GM/Ford:

G8 GXP
CTS-V
Corvette (all 3 models)
Cobalt SS
CTS
Silverado/Sierra
Tahoe/Yukon
Escalade
Malibu
Fusion Hybrid
Shelby GT-500
F-150/250/350

Honda/Toyota:

RX350 (bought wife one)
LS460 (maybe if I got bored with my life and wanted a nice cruiser)
S2000 (needs a new model before I would seriously consider another one)

That's it.


The market may prefer Honda/Toyota for certain offerings that are plebian in nature, but car enthusiasts frankly have MUCH, MUCH, MUCH more to choose from with GM and Ford than Honda or Toyota. That is sad.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 12:19 PM
  #17  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Originally Posted by TommyDeVito' date='Jan 5 2009, 04:58 PM
IE boring!
Low power, appliance cars are boring, but they are the bedrock of a car company - profits from a boring car give automakers the freedom to make niche cars like roadsters and convertibles. American car companies forsook this basic car and look where they are now - no money, canceling the fun projects, etc.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 12:21 PM
  #18  
TheDonEffect's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,365
Likes: 636
Default

More power= cars needs to be built more durable. Let's not forget, even with Hondas, you start upping the torque, things start to go wrong (think early 2000 V6 accords, TLs, and CLs, not to mention our "glass" diffs).
But, it has more to do with the material selection vs. power output, and the fact that the domestics really can't try and replicate what honda and toyota are doing because most consumers are fickle in that regard.
More than anything, the domestics need to rebuild their reputation and regain consumer trust, even folks on these boards wrongfully mudsling on occasion, just read any thread regarding a cobalt ss or corvette.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 12:25 PM
  #19  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Originally Posted by TheDonEffect' date='Jan 5 2009, 05:21 PM
More than anything, the domestics need to rebuild their reputation and regain consumer trust, even folks on these boards wrongfully mudsling on occasion, just read any thread regarding a cobalt ss or corvette.
I know more people that buy brand x because their last car was brand x than with any other product - they'll stick with an automaker regardless of cost, quality, what they really want, as long as they are not let down too much. People don't like change and it takes a pretty negative experience to get them to switch imo.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 12:41 PM
  #20  
The Gasman's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 59,195
Likes: 1
From: Ventura, California, USA
Default

My dad worked at Ford for a few years so my sister and I bought loaded explorers for a good employee discount. Now 6 years later my sister's is falling apart, tons of electrical gremlins. Mine is better with a few gremlins. My s2000 I bought a year earlier (granted it has 30k miles less than the explorer) is trouble free. My sister's accord 1996 model is trouble free. The American cars just aren't built well.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:31 PM.