2011 Ford GT500 spanks last year's model
#12
Talk about slow reflexes, though. Notice how he wasn't even close to staying on the pavement through the chicanes? He kept taking a couple of feet of dirt at the apex on a few because otherwise he couldn't maintain speed through there.
#15
Originally Posted by JonBoy,May 18 2010, 05:25 PM
Talk about slow reflexes, though. Notice how he wasn't even close to staying on the pavement through the chicanes? He kept taking a couple of feet of dirt at the apex on a few because otherwise he couldn't maintain speed through there.
Why wouldnt they run a few more and clean that up?
#16
I don't think he could've cleaned it up. The car is pretty big and heavy and it can't transition that quickly at those speeds. It wasn't the driver's reflexes that were slow, it was the car's reflexes that was making him do it.
It was faster to just barrel through like that than to slow down a bit and drive "cleanly"...
It was faster to just barrel through like that than to slow down a bit and drive "cleanly"...
#17
Originally Posted by JonBoy,May 19 2010, 06:15 AM
I don't think he could've cleaned it up. The car is pretty big and heavy and it can't transition that quickly at those speeds. It wasn't the driver's reflexes that were slow, it was the car's reflexes that was making him do it.
It was faster to just barrel through like that than to slow down a bit and drive "cleanly"...
It was faster to just barrel through like that than to slow down a bit and drive "cleanly"...
#18
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orlando
Posts: 6,536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Engineers were curious how much faster the latest iteration of Ford's ultimate Mustang is around VIR than the 2010 model. That's a good question, considering the 2011 model receives a number of upgrades (including the aforementioned performance package, which adds wider forged aluminum wheels, stickier rubber, a 3.73:1 drive ratio, stiffer springs, and revised aerodynamics) designed to help it move 'round a road course.
The result? An entertaining video, and a 2:58.5 lap time around the 4.1-mile track. In contrast, the 2010 GT 500 lapped VIR in 3:07.4, nine seconds slower. Seems like moving to an all-aluminum aluminum engine (which shed 102 pounds) and retuning the suspension did quite a bit of difference.
The result? An entertaining video, and a 2:58.5 lap time around the 4.1-mile track. In contrast, the 2010 GT 500 lapped VIR in 3:07.4, nine seconds slower. Seems like moving to an all-aluminum aluminum engine (which shed 102 pounds) and retuning the suspension did quite a bit of difference.
#20
Registered User
So it only takes it 114 HP more to match the corvette grandsport's time around VIR, LOL. That said, solid improvement over the 2010 model. Probably would have been even faster if the driving was smoother, some of it was fairly sloppy...