Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.
View Poll Results: Boxster v SLK350 v Z4
Boxster
35.90%
SLK350
48.72%
Z4
15.38%
Voters: 39. You may not vote on this poll

Boxster (base) v SLK350 v Z4

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-11-2005, 06:00 AM
  #1  
rai
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
rai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: mount airy
Posts: 7,981
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default Boxster (base) v SLK350 v Z4

OK I'm not in the market for one, but I'd rather have the Boxster even tho the hard-top vert is a great idea.

I don't want to put the Z4 in the poll but did anyway just in case.

Well Automobile has the SLK v Boxster

SLK350
$46K(base)/$51K(as tested)
3.5L 268hp 258-TQ
3280 lbs
0-60 5.9s
0-100 14.1s
0-120 21.5s
1/4 mile 14.2@101mph
70-0 braking 168 ft

Boxster
$44K/$49K
2.7L 236hp 199-TQ
3000 lbs
0-60 5.9s
0-100 15.1s
0-120 23.1s
14.5@98mph
70-0 151 ft

This was 6-speed MT for the SLK and 5-speed MT for the Boxster (But I think you can get a 6-speed for the Boxster)
Old 01-11-2005, 06:17 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
mvf4s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: north
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

slk = fruity
Old 01-11-2005, 11:05 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
bluedd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: bayarea
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Poor Z4 it's so ugly that it's like handicap by birth compared to others. It's so unfair to put it against the competition. There is not competition, although bmw might think there is.
Old 01-11-2005, 01:27 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
Officer_down's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bothell
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I beg to differ. I think the Z4 is very nice looking.
Old 01-11-2005, 01:46 PM
  #5  
Registered User

 
PedalFaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,014
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bluedd,Jan 11 2005, 12:05 PM
There is not competition, although bmw might think there is.
Have you ever even driven one? That 3.0 L inline six automatically qualifies the Z4 as competition for any sports car in that price range. It's also a respectable handler, although not on the same plane as the Boxster.

Steve
Old 01-11-2005, 02:46 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Ravenwerk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Dragon country
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Since the upgrades in power and styling I'll have to go with the SLK. The new lines really complement the looks.
Old 01-11-2005, 07:36 PM
  #7  
Registered User

 
Elistan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 15,323
Received 28 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Based on the specs above, it's a tossup. I'd have to drive both and choose based on the driving experience.
Old 01-11-2005, 08:06 PM
  #8  
Moderator

 
Saki GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Queen City, NC
Posts: 35,955
Received 197 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

The new MB is pretty hot, I think I'd take it over the new Boxster, but I'd have to experience the two to know for sure.

The Z is pretty ugly, despite its abilities. I think sales are way down on it -25% from 03 to 04. BMW sold more last-year Z3's in 2002 than Z4's in 2004, or so I've heard.
Old 01-11-2005, 08:55 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Z4EC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Test drove the auto SLK 350, wasn't impressed at all. There's a huge lag between shifts when in the manual mode. Going to test-drive the manual transmission tomorrow and maybe I'll get a better feel of its performance.
Old 01-12-2005, 04:54 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
bluedd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: bayarea
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PedalFaster,Jan 11 2005, 02:46 PM
Have you ever even driven one? That 3.0 L inline six automatically qualifies the Z4 as competition for any sports car in that price range. It's also a respectable handler, although not on the same plane as the Boxster.

Steve
Don't have one but just testdrives. I'm not referring to performance but when you buy an expensive car, image is very important especially others have equal or better performance. That's why MB is changing away from femine look of previous SLK besides performance because they loose much sales from that. And that's also one of the reasons why Z4 is selling so poorly compared to Z3 although you believe it is a better car. Read some article months ago about Z4 sales so low that it was at the sales number of Z3 at the last years before it went out.


Quick Reply: Boxster (base) v SLK350 v Z4



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:37 PM.