Mercedes Camless Engine
#21
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Fair Oaks
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by fx991,Apr 17 2006, 11:42 AM
right here i'm pretty much just summarizing an article i've read in Evo mag, and read a couple more over the internet (can't find the links sorry!).
And i meant that today's metal valve springs have to undergo extreme pressures and forces to be able to compress and expand rapidly enough to keep up with the engine. That a valve with such a small cross sectional area (say of 38 mm) would have to support 225 N of force, would equal a surface pressure of about 30 psi to expand, but then it would have to almost instanteously contract to a negligible pressure. That's where the statment of an enormously powerful pump would be needed.
Hope that helps F02K!
And i meant that today's metal valve springs have to undergo extreme pressures and forces to be able to compress and expand rapidly enough to keep up with the engine. That a valve with such a small cross sectional area (say of 38 mm) would have to support 225 N of force, would equal a surface pressure of about 30 psi to expand, but then it would have to almost instanteously contract to a negligible pressure. That's where the statment of an enormously powerful pump would be needed.
Hope that helps F02K!
#22
Didn't Jaguar do something with camless engine technology in their brief F1 stint? I thought they also pressurized the head so the valves would lift easier...
#23
Registered User
Originally Posted by mastamind,Apr 17 2006, 02:21 PM
LOL, true enough. If VW can't keep their windows from randomly falling off track, how reliable do you think their solenoids will be?
#24
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Christople,Apr 17 2006, 10:16 AM
MB pushing new tech like usual
Sam
#25
I'm still confused, I was under the impression that the solenoid operated valves would not have valve springs as we know them, so why would the solenoids have to overcome so much force?
But the bigger problem arises becuase of the acutal compressor has to be able to provide those pressures up to 9000 times every minute, which leaves it about half a millisecond to react. And in this time it has to pressurize enough air to provide the force necessary to close the valve again, whereas opening the valve is relatively easy (just a pressure relief valve). The high power rating on the compressor results from the incredibly high mass flow rates that are required to pump the air into the valve and push it out at the required times. At intervals, and that is the key part, is the pump has to push the air in at intervals, in F1 engines (as i understand it) they have the pump constantly pushing air into the valves, with a camshaft pushing the air out of the valves to depress them. A way to reliably open and close valves at a regular pace for production engines still hasn't truely found its way. But i'm rambling on terribley now, and i hope sincerely that that all makes sense!
#26
This is very interesting new tech - aluminum block diesels and now camless actuated valves in production cars.
The biggest benefit of the solenoid is that there are no valve springs, which are just as stiff at idle as they are at redline, leading to inefficiencies either at the top end or the low end (depending on how the engine is optimized). So if your car is idling in traffic, something like a quarter of the losses could be due to pushing the very stiff valve springs. This has big implications to limited duty ICE designs like hybrid or lean burn.
There have been racing engines with hydraulic or pneumatic valvetrains, no real reason to use them on production vehicles as there are still the springs. Desmo can help out at the high end, but really is most useful when displacement cannot be easily increased as is the case in formula racing or bikes.
The biggest benefit of the solenoid is that there are no valve springs, which are just as stiff at idle as they are at redline, leading to inefficiencies either at the top end or the low end (depending on how the engine is optimized). So if your car is idling in traffic, something like a quarter of the losses could be due to pushing the very stiff valve springs. This has big implications to limited duty ICE designs like hybrid or lean burn.
There have been racing engines with hydraulic or pneumatic valvetrains, no real reason to use them on production vehicles as there are still the springs. Desmo can help out at the high end, but really is most useful when displacement cannot be easily increased as is the case in formula racing or bikes.
#27
Also regarding the valve kinetics issue, read here:
http://www.memagazine.org/backissues/may03...controlled.html
http://www.memagazine.org/backissues/may03...controlled.html
#30
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Abilene, TX
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
==What might be stoping others from coming out sooner is you have to change the whole electrical system to run with the higher current.
Sam==
Actually the wiring can be lighter as higher voltage means lower current for the same power. A weight savings. That's one reason that aviation went to a 24 volt system a long time ago.
Sam==
Actually the wiring can be lighter as higher voltage means lower current for the same power. A weight savings. That's one reason that aviation went to a 24 volt system a long time ago.