Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Torn between two cars!

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-06-2003, 08:33 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
weirdalchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: rolling meadows
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Torn between two cars!

Hey fellas, im here trying to convince my father to purchase a s2000. right now he is considering the s2000 and the 350z. from what i have read so far i understand that you can give the s2k a little bit more power or acceleration by changing the rear end gear ratio to 4.44 or 4.77 i believe. basically i am just wondering why he should get this car and not the 350z. i do like this car for the looks a little bit more and if i better understood this whole gearing situation then maybe i would have better luck persuading him into buying the s2k instead. also honestly what does changing the gear ratio do for the car as far as acceleration is concerned. thanks in advance for any help....
Old 08-06-2003, 08:42 AM
  #2  
Registered User

 
Woodson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Search is your friend. Wrong forum.

But welcome!
Old 08-06-2003, 08:47 AM
  #3  
Registered User

 
Triple-H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: West Henrietta UPSTATE NY
Posts: 58,680
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

This is all I have to say, print it out and give it to your dad.
http://www.caranddriver.com/article.asp?se...article_id=6846
Old 08-06-2003, 08:51 AM
  #4  
Registered User

 
koala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 7,731
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I just drove the shit out of a 350Z last week. It was alright... not a big fan of the car though.
Old 08-06-2003, 08:57 AM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
weirdalchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: rolling meadows
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have tried searching the forums for more info on the gearing but none that i have seen have offered any real useable data to show it gives gains.
Old 08-06-2003, 09:22 AM
  #6  

 
xviper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 37,305
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally posted by weirdalchy
i have tried searching the forums for more info on the gearing but none that i have seen have offered any real useable data to show it gives gains.
These accountings are all over the forum. You just haven't found any yet. Here's one:
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/showthread.php?...threadid=117349
Old 08-06-2003, 10:17 AM
  #7  
rai
Registered User

 
rai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: mount airy
Posts: 7,981
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

weirdalchy, welcome. You're missing the point of the S2000. If all you care about is 0-60 or 0-100mph.

That's not what it's about. The 4.44 may make it more peppy, and it would have been nice if it came that way from the factory (Oh well).

This car is not about "numbers". It makes good numbers, but it's not about that. It's about driving. Shifter feel (the best in the world), fun to drive (one of the best), drop top carving up a winding road.

I love my S2000 because of the way it feels when I drive it. I don't "race" other cars and I doubt your father will be racing either.

From what I've read the S2000 is equal to the 350Z up to 100mph.

If you want a fast 1/4 mile car why not get a SVT cobra or a STi?

If you want a fun to drive convertible, light weight lively handling, the S2000 is great.
Old 08-06-2003, 10:45 PM
  #8  

 
s2ka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,037
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Drive S2000 = Huge grin

Drive 350Z = Hmmm, not bad

Drop the top, find a canyon road, can't beat the S2000 for ~$30,000. You don't need to change the rear end gears to have a blast with it. For that matter, you don't need to add ANYTHING to the S2000. Lots of people (like me) add stuff to our cars because we want to customize it. The stock S2000 is excellent on the street and on the track.

Old 08-06-2003, 11:26 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
TwiBlueG35's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bell
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

To answer your question regarding the help of changing the rear end gear ratio. I am not sure if rear end gear ratio is the same thing as final drive gear ratio. This is how I understand it, might not be totally correct. All vehicles use a differential to provide an additional torque multiplication(gear reduction). Since S2000 is a rear wheel drive vehicle, so its transmission is not located in a transaxle like front wheel drive vehicle does, so the final drive ratio is also the rear differential gear ratio. In this case, the final drive gears include the pinion shaft pinion gear and the large differential ring gear. Because the pinion shaft pinion gear is much smaller than the ring gear, so there would be a substantial torque mulitplication. For example, when you are in first gear and the first gear ratio is 4:1, and the final drive ratio is 3.78:1, then the overall gear ratio would be 4*3.78=15.12. This means driving torque at the drive axles and wheels is 15.12 times greater than engine torque. By changing the rear differential gear ratio, torque mulitiplication would also be changed. Therefore acceleration could be improved. One thing you need to realize is that increasing torque would also reduce the speed.
Old 08-07-2003, 02:01 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
ellisnc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by s2ka
Drive S2000 = Huge grin

Drive 350Z = Hmmm, not bad

Drop the top, find a canyon road, can't beat the S2000 for ~$30,000. You don't need to change the rear end gears to have a blast with it. For that matter, you don't need to add ANYTHING to the S2000. Lots of people (like me) add stuff to our cars because we want to customize it. The stock S2000 is excellent on the street and on the track.

This is so true... S2000 is a pure driver's car. Doesn't have tons of power, AWD, vehicle stability assist, traction control, side airbags, 4 cupholders, 3 power outlets, electronic throttle, 300W stereo, heated seats. But that's what I love about it. I had an AE86 not too long ago that was pretty slow when you got down to it, but it was all about the driver. The S2000 is very very similar in that respect.

The car is extremely fast around a track with the right driver. It's common in Japan for someone to say the AE86 trains the driver. The same is true with the S2000 in my mind.


Quick Reply: Torn between two cars!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:24 AM.