4x4's
[QUOTE=dreamer,Jan 15 2010, 02:39 PM] Ok so facts:
Safety: Yes you will probably be worse off if a 4x4 doing 30mph hits you compared to an estate car because it weighs more and the bonnets used to be higher (from a brief google there seems to be a lot of work going on there to make them more pedestrian friendly).
Safety: Yes you will probably be worse off if a 4x4 doing 30mph hits you compared to an estate car because it weighs more and the bonnets used to be higher (from a brief google there seems to be a lot of work going on there to make them more pedestrian friendly).
Ok fair enough! I just think "people" (as in Joe Public) don't know the facts and make massive judgements based on media reporting which is generally speaking inaccurate.
I still think the width argument is tenuous though
I still think the width argument is tenuous though
Two 4x4s try to pass each other on a narrow street.
Two Estate cars try to pass each other on a narrow street.
The Estate cars have roughly a foot more space to do so.
Two Estate cars try to pass each other on a narrow street.
The Estate cars have roughly a foot more space to do so.
Me, yesterday morning: It just so happens that a significant amount of cars with high CO2/km figures are heavy 4x4s (as well as ligh S2000s) and so it becomes a media feeding frenzy.







(jk!!)