I am glad they did the test with the roof up

But you can see how softly the spring rate is on the S compared to the RR.

That and so much of the S is set up for comfort - Air con, lots of sound deadening, super heavy exhausts that dampen the noise, the worlds biggest airbox to dampen the noise, and quite a high ride height.

Then they come out with the

 

I don't like the new wheels ..... they don't suit the car at all.

The S still looks good though

 

Dont care how much quicker the mugen is it still looks like a chav wagon. Absolutley disgusting, id feel embarrassed driving that peice of shite.

 

The Mugen RR can be had fo

 

My opinions on the FD2 are well known. the Mugen thing is a joke given the sum you need to spend to get it to the spec. It looks fairly cool though.
Stock the FD2 is quicker than the S2000 round a track, without any shadow of a doubt.
The FD2 with 10k of mods would be quicker but the S2000 with 10k of mods would be far quicker so the RR is just dumb overall, there are better ways to spend your money. It relates to the maturity of the aftermarket parts though, the FD2 will be continually amazing for years to come round the track. On the road though they are a nightmare and need new coilovers before you even start .

50k is miles off the mark though Ron if you genuinely want one now I'm sure 35-40k is still possible.

I'm going to watch it on the five watch again beastie and see what they have to say.

 

We'll see

I know i exaggerated, but so did 5th gear.

And how many of these 'Limited Run' cars will they make?

My S has cost me about

 

They made 300 of them and they have sold them all

We all know how little you spend on your car mate

 

On a dry day

Personally if i had the cash id have one on my drive as well as an S. Four doors,plenty of room,fast and cheap to run. For me an ideal daily driver.

 

on both counts

My S is no problem in the wet