Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

BMW 335i

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 01:55 AM
  #21  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

Call it sorting the icons from the chaff, if you like.

The thing is with shortening model cycles & pointless model variations, most new cars are chaff.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 02:54 AM
  #22  
matthehat17's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
From: Notts & Bristol wanderer
Default

Heh, I like that one Nick! It's like Blur's album: "Modern Cars Are Rubbish."



I don't subscribe to that view myself, but my colleague does, so it's nice to have a modern BMW fan and a classic fan on the mag.

Not that I dislike classic BMs, though... love the CSL Batmobile and old E9 coupes, E30 M3 Sport Evo is one of the finest cars ever built and I'd probably kill for a drive of an E28 M5, the only M5 I've not yet driven...
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 03:34 AM
  #23  
dreamer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,493
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Default

Pics and MPG ?
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 03:38 AM
  #24  
Bada Bing!'s Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 17,824
Likes: 0
From: West Coast
Default

Originally Posted by gaddafi,Sep 21 2006, 10:41 AM
the 'right time to buy' always interests me when talking about secondhand cars

this scenario as much as any other

there does come a point when a performance car (if not a classic), ceases to make much sense for anyone who isn't on the tightest of budgets

the E36 M3 coupe is rapidly becoming a case in point

most are high milers and maintenance is starting to be skimped, they look a little dated and they will be similar to the 335i in performance - but they are cheap

but in three years time, when there are stacks of s/h 335is on the market (and E46 M3s), you won't be able to give them away (convertibles excepted)

at the same time, I still can't see that a three year old 335i is going to be more desirable (to any petrolhead) than a five/six year old E46 M3 (which will still be cheaper)

the E46 will be helped by its styling and its reputation - two areas that let down the E36

all imo of course

unfortunately for the 335i - its window of fame will be small - the 328i and 330i were hailed as exceptional in their day too

what price a 328i today?
Unless BMW reduce their servicing costs for the E46 M3 engined cars, I can't see them ever being desirable with cost-conscious buyers. Even when they get to the 10k mark to buy, the service costs will be crippling, as will any engine problems.

As far as I'm concerned it's a car which only really worked with its target 1st time buyers. Second hand the car makes very little sense, as most people are looking to spend half what the car was worth, because they didn't have enough to buy it new. But the irony is it will be even more expensive to own that it would have been when it had a warranty as new.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 03:53 AM
  #25  
matthehat17's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
From: Notts & Bristol wanderer
Default

Originally Posted by dreamer,Sep 21 2006, 11:34 AM
Pics and MPG ?
I'll try and get a few pics up ASAP but we've got to get them to press before I can post. Sorry! Mpg, well BMW claims 29.7mpg... in reality, driving it on British roads, I'd say 25-26mpg is more likely, which is pretty good. I drove it, er... quite quickly back across France and managed 23.5mpg, so even thrashing it you get fairly good returns.

Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 07:01 AM
  #26  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

...which, together with lower emissions, is the whole point of LPTs.

Honda's K23 only provides 240bhp - admittedly tuned for an SUV where torque is most important.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 12:39 PM
  #27  
Nottm_S2's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23,305
Likes: 832
From: Nottingham
Default

Originally Posted by Bada Bing!,Sep 21 2006, 11:38 AM
Unless BMW reduce their servicing costs for the E46 M3 engined cars, I can't see them ever being desirable with cost-conscious buyers. Even when they get to the 10k mark to buy, the service costs will be crippling, as will any engine problems.

As far as I'm concerned it's a car which only really worked with its target 1st time buyers. Second hand the car makes very little sense, as most people are looking to spend half what the car was worth, because they didn't have enough to buy it new. But the irony is it will be even more expensive to own that it would have been when it had a warranty as new.
that's not a great argument bada. all high performance cars are capable of ruining you when bought used. you need to make an informed buy and then look after it, perhaps wrap it in cotton wool.

just ask Kiwi-s2000

if you can find a good specialist i'd bet you could keep one on the road pretty cheaply..

as an example a mate had a shed of a 911 years ago and it broke the gearbox and cost him about 25% of the car's value to fix..

wasn't even quick
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 02:21 PM
  #28  
Bada Bing!'s Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 17,824
Likes: 0
From: West Coast
Default

I wouldn't say so though, mate. An S2K doesn't cost a lot of money to run or service, and very little goes wrong with it, although admittedly I wouldn't call it high performance.A 911 is cheaper to run and service than an E46 M3, though. In fact a 996 911 and the NSX are two notable exceptions to the rule that performance cars are expensive to run. Service costs for both cars are excellent, and the warranty for the 911 is a bargain.

I was looking at buying a 40k 911, but wouldn't have touched a 20k M3 despite the performance of the two cars being very similar. The M was just ridiculous to run. And the peace of mind of a warranty came at nearly 3 times the cost of a 911 one on the M3 with a
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2006 | 12:24 AM
  #29  
Nottm_S2's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23,305
Likes: 832
From: Nottingham
Default

Originally Posted by Bada Bing!,Sep 21 2006, 10:21 PM
In fact a 996 911 and the NSX are two notable exceptions to the rule that performance cars are expensive to run.
i see what you're saying but that's what i was getting at.. the 911 and the NSX are perhaps the exceptions, not the M3. and if anything serious goes wrong with either... lets just say you won't be buying that new plasma telly

there's a guy here running an 02 M3.. i'll have to track him down and quiz him on costs.. when it comes to 911's i only like the really fast ones. the turbo basically. and they're pricey.

all these cars run through my head as an S replacement once i've finished the house.. it'll be a while yet but M3 depreciation is sharp so that alone attracts. you'll get an 03/04 for ballpark 20k.. a similar age 911 will cost best part of double that.

hmm.. i could put the 20k in the bank for servicing

Reply
Old Sep 22, 2006 | 12:45 AM
  #30  
Bada Bing!'s Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 17,824
Likes: 0
From: West Coast
Default

Originally Posted by Nottm_S2,Sep 22 2006, 09:24 AM
hmm.. i could put the 20k in the bank for servicing
Fair point.

When I was looking, my 40k was coming from a finance company so I had bugger all to put away for servicing/emergencies.

Hence why a 28k car with very low service costs made sense.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:26 PM.