Chalk and Cheese
Sometimes, statistics themselves are bollocks, this is one of those times.
Power to weight is great and all, but past 100mph, you are looking at power to Cd.
And if you think there is going to be any noticeable difference between an E39 M5 and an E90 M3 on the public motorway/dual carridgeway you are very much mistaken.
I drive round in the S, my mate in his B18C-R'ed EK4. I have >50bhp more than he does and all the way upto 120 leptons, there is NOTHING in it. His car is limited to 120 ATM.
Although if you do want speed records, i'm sure nothing is quite as fast as the Cayenne at depreciating
Power to weight is great and all, but past 100mph, you are looking at power to Cd.
And if you think there is going to be any noticeable difference between an E39 M5 and an E90 M3 on the public motorway/dual carridgeway you are very much mistaken.
I drive round in the S, my mate in his B18C-R'ed EK4. I have >50bhp more than he does and all the way upto 120 leptons, there is NOTHING in it. His car is limited to 120 ATM.
Although if you do want speed records, i'm sure nothing is quite as fast as the Cayenne at depreciating

Originally Posted by MB,Mar 28 2009, 10:37 PM
Cheers Gad.
The new M3 look superb and is getting rave reviews (apart from poor brakes)

It's revvy too.
Seeing as the Coupe can be had for low 30's, i'd be interested.
RE the 0-60 times, the auto is a touch quicker according to BMW website.
http://www.bmw.co.uk/bmwuk/pricesandspecif...t-bmwuk,00.html
The new M3 look superb and is getting rave reviews (apart from poor brakes)
It's revvy too.
Seeing as the Coupe can be had for low 30's, i'd be interested.
RE the 0-60 times, the auto is a touch quicker according to BMW website.
http://www.bmw.co.uk/bmwuk/pricesandspecif...t-bmwuk,00.html
Anyway, no point me rambling on - go and have a damned good thrash of one yourself soon and let us know what you make of it!
98
Originally Posted by Nottm_S2,Mar 29 2009, 02:11 PM
Moggy, be specific, i'm interested not being argumentative. which bits of the stats i found are BS?
i think most petrolheads know the E39 M5's rep and love the car for that
i think most petrolheads know the E39 M5's rep and love the car for that
The M5 is 400bhp.
The weight is 1795kg with a full tank of fuel and a driver.
Therefore the power to weight is somewhere between 222-235bhp/tonne, depending on how you are comparing cars.
0-62 is 5.3s
0-75 is 7.2s
Standing start kilometre is 24.1s
All the above are taken straight from the owners manual.
0-100 is around 11s, depending upon which test run you read-(you can do a reasonableness test on this figure using the 0-62 & 0-75 stats above and assuming linear accelaration up to 100). Possibly you posted 14.1 by mistake? Seriously, I could do that without the use of my legs.
no, it's honestly sourced from the sites i mentioned. which may be wrong for all i know
the stuff i do know first hand has always been correct though
they quote 4.9 and 10.79 for the 60 and 100 sprints
EDIT
i've just noticed a typo
.. i wrote 14.1 but it was actually 13.1
is that nearer the mark?
the stuff i do know first hand has always been correct though
they quote 4.9 and 10.79 for the 60 and 100 sprints
EDIT
i've just noticed a typo
.. i wrote 14.1 but it was actually 13.1is that nearer the mark?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







you great puddin!