Crash Blame
Imagine a T junction between 2 A roads.
Both have a 50 limit, both have normal dashed white lines for the length of the section in question.
Mr Turner drives up the road and at the T he glances right sees the road is clear and pulls out to the left. . . . .. and meets Mr Overtaker.
They Crash.
I'm wondering if anyone knows legally who is to blame here.
I'm also interested in discussing any personal opinions from anyone who doesn't know the law.
Would it be different if Mr Turner was pulling out of a driveway rather than another A road?
Both have a 50 limit, both have normal dashed white lines for the length of the section in question.
Mr Turner drives up the road and at the T he glances right sees the road is clear and pulls out to the left. . . . .. and meets Mr Overtaker.
They Crash.
I'm wondering if anyone knows legally who is to blame here.
I'm also interested in discussing any personal opinions from anyone who doesn't know the law.

Would it be different if Mr Turner was pulling out of a driveway rather than another A road?
Assuming Mr Overtaker is driving legally
Mr Turner is to blame
He has committed the common error of only looking right when turning left from a junction
It is his responsibility to check that the road is clear before entering it from behind a stop line
He has to give way to traffic from both directions, not just stuff coming from his right
Mr Turner may wriggle, but he is extremely unlikely to get anywhere
Mr Turner is to blame
He has committed the common error of only looking right when turning left from a junction
It is his responsibility to check that the road is clear before entering it from behind a stop line
He has to give way to traffic from both directions, not just stuff coming from his right
Mr Turner may wriggle, but he is extremely unlikely to get anywhere
Originally Posted by smnasn,Nov 10 2009, 06:18 PM
albeit one may question the wisdom from a common-sense point of view of overtaking by a junction of course.
maybe the car being overtaken had stopped?
is Mr Overtaker to sit there until it moves off again?
Originally Posted by gaddafi,Nov 10 2009, 07:24 PM
not without more facts
maybe the car being overtaken had stopped?
is Mr Overtaker to sit there until it moves off again?

maybe the car being overtaken had stopped?
is Mr Overtaker to sit there until it moves off again?

But assuming motion then clearly it is unwise.
And assuming the overtakee is stationary, the overtaker might be well advised to use his horn to warn of his action.
Unless it's after 11:30pm. Then I give up
Trending Topics
Can anyone think of a time when you could blame Mr Overtaker.
Either legally or morally?
I guess you could argue that if Mr Overtaker could see Mr Turner approaching the junction then he would be foolish to overtake ... but of course it's still Mr Turners responsibilty to check.
Either legally or morally?
I guess you could argue that if Mr Overtaker could see Mr Turner approaching the junction then he would be foolish to overtake ... but of course it's still Mr Turners responsibilty to check.
isnt there something about not overtaking (unless ABSOLUTELY nesscersary) at junctions, including T junctions like in this scenario?
i'm siding with the above - mr turner is in the wrong since you should look both ways before pulling out.
i'm siding with the above - mr turner is in the wrong since you should look both ways before pulling out.







Give way means Give way.