Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Honda 1300

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 01:13 AM
  #1  
Polemicist's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,326
Likes: 1
From: Ulaanbaatar
Default Honda 1300

I was shooting the breeze with my next door neighbour the evening before last and it transpires he was a senior engineer for Audi in Ingolstadt some years ago (his wife was responsible for component stress analysis there).

He was chatting about my S and he mentioned in the very late 60's / very early 70's Audi covertly imported a Honda 1300 on behalf of VW. Apparently it wasn't only Toyota who were anxious about the 100 hp from the 1300's engine - VW were in a state of panic over Honda's air cooled four cylinder engine too. At the time their 1300 flat four was good for 40 something horsepower IIRC...


Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 01:15 AM
  #2  
lovegroova's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 24,771
Likes: 311
From: Stanmore
Default

And rather than competing, they "invented" torque figures...
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 01:29 AM
  #3  
gaddafi's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 31,739
Likes: 69
From: Survivalist enclave
Default

I bet Nick knew about this already
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 01:58 AM
  #4  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

I didn't, but I'm unsurprised.

In the early 1970s, VW nearly went bust hanging on to Porsche's ideas stolen from Ledwinka in the 1930s.

Audi basically designed all of the water-cooled engines and most of the platforms that saved the company. The engines are still made today, unually with BL-style over-stroking to enlarge the capacity. Which is why they're rough...

It is quite well-known that the Honda 1300 scared a lot of people. Including Honda's own with its overheating problems, which is why they 'persuaded' Soichiro to retire to research...

His long time partner Kawamoto too over as CEO.

Basically a four-pot can be air-cooled on a naked bike. Bury it in the bonnet of a c/d-segment and it will overheat the middle pots. Especially at 76 BHP/Litre!
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 02:37 AM
  #5  
Polemicist's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,326
Likes: 1
From: Ulaanbaatar
Default

I'm looking forward to having further interesting chats with the man next door. He worked on several of the platforms developed by Audi.

Interestingly he is a fully committed FWD car owner - he won't entertain a RWD car as he opines they're inherently unstable.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 02:52 AM
  #6  
PaulF's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,087
Likes: 4
From: In the gutter
Default

Originally Posted by Polemicist,Jun 10 2009, 11:37 AM
he won't entertain a RWD car as he opines they're inherently unstable.
Mine's in the car park at the moment making plans to kill me
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 04:08 AM
  #7  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

Originally Posted by Polemicist,Jun 10 2009, 10:37 AM
I'm looking forward to having further interesting chats with the man next door. He worked on several of the platforms developed by Audi.

Interestingly he is a fully committed FWD car owner - he won't entertain a RWD car as he opines they're inherently unstable.
Sometimes instability is a good thing! But not too much...

But the underrated Audi 80 (why did people worship those f ucking abysmal TaunusCortinas?) of 1973 had a forward-mounted EA827, pioneered negative scrub-radius steering (ask HIM about wheel offsets!) and had an innovative rear torsion beam axle. The car was all about stability. It was a very innovative car, in a deadpan conservative way. The 110BHP GTE engine got kidnapped for a very significant VW Golf, too!
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 05:54 AM
  #8  
Polemicist's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,326
Likes: 1
From: Ulaanbaatar
Default

The Audi 80 came into conversation too - I believe he worked on the suspension and platform.

He alluded to a very innovative rear suspension developed by Audi with an early iteration of passive RWS, it was patented but never developed due to the cost of production.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 06:01 AM
  #9  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

That's interesting - there were very few manufacturers back then that really understood it properly - FIAT stands out as one.

It's one reason why so many semi-trailing armed German cars could be a bit lethal - the 323i springs to mind.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 07:49 AM
  #10  
Shiskine's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,456
Likes: 5
From: Glasgow, Scotland
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Graves,Jun 10 2009, 03:01 PM
That's interesting - there were very few manufacturers back then that really understood it properly - FIAT stands out as one.
Makes the old man's choice of two Fiat 124s followed by an Audi 80 in the 70s not too bad then ...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:25 PM.