M5
You have to think about what and who these cars are designed for. BMW aimed them at the rich and the affluent who wouldn't moan about the running or maintenance costs.
It was inevitable that they would appeal to enthusiasts and image conscious people (because they are drivers cars and the BMW tag), who couldn't necessarily afford them.
Even though they remain a very good machine, now owning an E46 M3 is really nothing to write home about. I have two immediate friends and know four people personally who have an E46 M3.
One of them has had nothing go wrong with it other than the clutch and the other seems to drive it less than the BMW technicians.
M5's although considerably rarer, would probably be similar in principle. Some good some bad.
I agree with gaddafi though those than complain about running costs whilst/after owning them are fur coat and no knickers types. You don't have to have owned one to work out M cars are not cheap to maintain (relatively). If you cant afford it, save yourself the headach.
But as usual... its your money, your situation. Make up your own mind.
It was inevitable that they would appeal to enthusiasts and image conscious people (because they are drivers cars and the BMW tag), who couldn't necessarily afford them.
Even though they remain a very good machine, now owning an E46 M3 is really nothing to write home about. I have two immediate friends and know four people personally who have an E46 M3.
One of them has had nothing go wrong with it other than the clutch and the other seems to drive it less than the BMW technicians.
M5's although considerably rarer, would probably be similar in principle. Some good some bad.
I agree with gaddafi though those than complain about running costs whilst/after owning them are fur coat and no knickers types. You don't have to have owned one to work out M cars are not cheap to maintain (relatively). If you cant afford it, save yourself the headach.
But as usual... its your money, your situation. Make up your own mind.
Originally Posted by S2000_UK,Apr 21 2006, 04:03 AM
One of them has had nothing go wrong with it other than the clutch and the other seems to drive it less than the BMW technicians.
Out of all my cars and motorcycles I have never replaced a clutch or blown an engine. In fact the only big things to ever really go wrong are consumables. I have mates who drive similar vehicles who kill them in a matter of weeks.
Originally Posted by cejsmith,Apr 21 2006, 07:09 AM
gaddafi
Do you know how many miles the engines are good for before they need a lot of money spent on them?
Do you know how many miles the engines are good for before they need a lot of money spent on them?
you'll find that's the one 'weakness' of the engine
slight mods were made to later cars (another good reason for getting a facelift model - late 2001 on)
VANOS can fail at 50,000 miles or never fail
most people would say the engine is easily good for 150,000 miles without major repairs
it's hard to say though - the cars aren't that old and so really high milers are quite rare
so, in essence, if the car has been looked after, and there are no VANOS problems, it will only be bad luck that will catch you out
evidence of care is important
the cars use oil - particularly the older ones - not unlike the S2000
unfortunately, if the levels have been neglected, the payback may only occur many thousands of miles down the line
Originally Posted by Rawhide,Apr 21 2006, 04:36 AM
I've always been amazed by statements like this. I think some people just have no natural affinity with machines or mechanical sypathy.
Out of all my cars and motorcycles I have never replaced a clutch or blown an engine. In fact the only big things to ever really go wrong are consumables. I have mates who drive similar vehicles who kill them in a matter of weeks.
Out of all my cars and motorcycles I have never replaced a clutch or blown an engine. In fact the only big things to ever really go wrong are consumables. I have mates who drive similar vehicles who kill them in a matter of weeks.
The clutch was replaced under warranty so it was a defect. The others were things like headlight xenon ballast and window regulator etc.
M5 clutches tend to go at around 55,000 miles
I expect M3 clutches last longer - given that they are considerably less powerful
of course that's an average
but given the power you have, I don't see it as unreasonable
you have to remember, that will probably outlast the first three years and first owner, so they are going to be happy
the
I expect M3 clutches last longer - given that they are considerably less powerful
of course that's an average
but given the power you have, I don't see it as unreasonable
you have to remember, that will probably outlast the first three years and first owner, so they are going to be happy
the
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



