Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Mazda MX5

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 6, 2012 | 01:43 AM
  #11  
david.mt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
From: York
Default

I had a 1.8 Mk2.5 with over 300bhp - now that was a fun car and much much quicker than a S2k and probably quicker than my supercharged S2k. I would miss the electric roof though
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2012 | 01:44 AM
  #12  
Spies's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 1
From: The Lake District
Default

Originally Posted by David.mt
I had a 1.8 Mk2.5 with over 300bhp - now that was a fun car and much much quicker than a S2k and probably quicker than my supercharged S2k. I would miss the electric roof though
Coupe has folding electric hard top doesn't it?
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2012 | 04:23 AM
  #13  
crispyshark's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: East London
Default

unless you are going for the mrk1 with the new bbr turbo package i think you are defo moving backwards....and slightly mad
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2012 | 07:49 AM
  #14  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

Sort of depends.

I'd suggest a snail would be better on an S2K; you forget how wobbly the MX-5 body/chassis actually was!

Then again, if you want a tamer car for softer back-lane cruising that can also be driven on its limits all of the time, a step backwards isn't a bad thing.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2012 | 07:57 AM
  #15  
Spies's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 1
From: The Lake District
Default

To be fair the roads are so ******* awful here that you can't push on for fear of hitting a pothole or loose tarmac from deteriorating road surface.

Can't remember the last time I Vtec'd yo...
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2012 | 08:01 AM
  #16  
s2konroids's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 20,788
Likes: 8
From: location, location
Default

I think you'd be going backwards for sure Carl, less power, less desirable, dare i say worse looking.

Its not a bad car and it does what i does well...being a reasonably priced, reliable and fun sport'ish car but overall it isn't in the same league as an S2000.

I think are good cars i really do but they are a hell of lot less macho IYKWI
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2012 | 09:30 AM
  #17  
Penelope Ptistop's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
From: Lincs
Default

Oi! I don't drive a macho car!

Agree that MX5's are a bit more girly though...
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2012 | 10:20 AM
  #18  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

That handbag emoticon is great!

Perfect for all the keyboard warriors on Pissedonheads & the like!
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2012 | 12:43 AM
  #19  
RichUK's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 45,694
Likes: 1
From: Oxfordshire
Default

I do prefer what we did with our MX5 -

Reply
Old Mar 7, 2012 | 01:51 AM
  #20  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

I'd delete that photo IIWY.

There'll be some hellatwat trying to mimic that front camber/offset on their S2000 next. Or telling you it needs slammin.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:31 AM.