More scamera news
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,794
Likes: 1
From: La Massana, Principat D'Andorra
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,794
Likes: 1
From: La Massana, Principat D'Andorra
Originally Posted by Hypersonik,May 24 2006, 01:31 PM
Yep so, just like truvelo cameras, totally useless against motorbikes who are more likely to speed.
From my own observations on the bike, when it comes to the areas where there are more likely to be pedestrians about i.e. the 30 and 40 limits, its the cars who speed far more than the bikes.
Trending Topics
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 11,866
Likes: 0
From: Bristol-ish
While I agree that inappropriate use of speed is a dangerous thing, particularly around built-up areas such as schools etc., surely the very fact that there are so many people who are prepared to lie/call-it-what-you-will to avoid a ban suggests that the rules are simply wrong in the first place?
Why don't the law makers look closely at the underlying problem rather than trying to 'patch-up' the situation by making even more complex rules that surround the underlying cause?
Why don't the law makers look closely at the underlying problem rather than trying to 'patch-up' the situation by making even more complex rules that surround the underlying cause?
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 12,330
Likes: 0
From: Frustration
Originally Posted by Welshman,May 24 2006, 05:51 AM
Making a bit of an AN ASS UMPTION there aren't you.
From my own observations on the bike, when it comes to the areas where there are more likely to be pedestrians about i.e. the 30 and 40 limits, its the cars who speed far more than the bikes.
From my own observations on the bike, when it comes to the areas where there are more likely to be pedestrians about i.e. the 30 and 40 limits, its the cars who speed far more than the bikes.
This is an paragraph taken from Transport Statistics Bulletin - Vehicle Speeds in Great Britain
'BUILT-UP ROADS - 2005 ESTIMATES (Chart 2 and Section 2: Tables 5 - 8)