Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Tax on fuel

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 09:48 AM
  #1  
alex.stanley's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 11,866
Likes: 0
From: Bristol-ish
Default Tax on fuel

Yes, we already know that we pay too much for fuel, but I still thought this article was interesting...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/13/bu...2008_fuel_duty/

Reply
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 10:44 AM
  #2  
mikdys's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 7
Default

How very true.

The tax we pay on fuel is disproportionate to the CO2 our cars produce and it really is staggering the percentage tax within the cost of UK petrol. I think the fuel companies ought to split out the tax element on the receipts they provide. Your average receipt would then look something like this:

45 litres unleaded @
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 07:56 PM
  #3  
Ultra_Nexus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 12,330
Likes: 0
From: Frustration
Default

Originally Posted by alex.stanley,Mar 21 2008, 05:48 PM
Yes, we already know that we pay too much for fuel, but I still thought this article was interesting...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/13/bu...2008_fuel_duty/
For the government the words:

Fair, Sensible, Logical

Mean:

Terrorist, Taliban, Iraq

What we really need to be saying is how reducing the cost of fuel duty is good for the environment and how it can make them more money.

We'd be onto a winner then, regardless of whether the legislation/red tape created by it would cost tens of billions like every other action the government has taken.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 02:12 AM
  #4  
arsie's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 11,504
Likes: 241
From: Sunny Norf*ck
Default

All can be understood with one simple premise:

our governments adopt or invent causes to justify more tax.

It doesn't have to be logical, fair, just, or for any good reason at all in fact!

But, to keep the millions of unnecessary bums (aka civil "servants") on their fur-lined seats and to give millions of scientists and academics something to do, the causes have to be justified to keep up the facade of democracy in this country.

All of which wastes a damn sight more resources, green and otherwise, than any other single cause on the planet
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 03:49 AM
  #5  
Subaru2000's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 0
From: Leeds
Default

Originally Posted by arsie,Mar 22 2008, 10:12 AM
All can be understood with one simple premise:

our governments adopt or invent causes to justify more tax.

It doesn't have to be logical, fair, just, or for any good reason at all in fact!

But, to keep the millions of unnecessary bums (aka civil "servants") on their fur-lined seats and to give millions of scientists and academics something to do, the causes have to be justified to keep up the facade of democracy in this country.

All of which wastes a damn sight more resources, green and otherwise, than any other single cause on the planet
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 04:09 AM
  #6  
gaddafi's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 31,739
Likes: 69
From: Survivalist enclave
Default

[QUOTE=mikdys,Mar 21 2008, 06:44 PM] I think the fuel companies ought to split out the tax element on the receipts they provide. Your average receipt would then look something like this:

45 litres unleaded @
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 04:16 AM
  #7  
eSeM's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 39,548
Likes: 11
From: City Of London / Knebworth
Default

Repost ......

It was posted in one of the 'Budget' threads a week or so ago.

Here

HTH

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bundle of Mayhem
Car Talk - Non S2000
14
Aug 4, 2009 03:49 AM
SweetS2K
S2000 Under The Hood
3
Jul 2, 2008 10:24 AM
MugenAP2
S2000 Under The Hood
0
May 20, 2008 01:16 PM
PanteraKitty
S2000 Vintage Owners
0
Sep 13, 2006 08:56 PM
dgl1
S2000 Under The Hood
1
Aug 9, 2001 08:13 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:33 PM.