Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Test drive in an Atom

Thread Tools
 
Old May 18, 2012 | 04:52 AM
  #21  
Welshman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,794
Likes: 1
From: La Massana, Principat D'Andorra
Default

Depends on what you define as near. Route was right out of the factory, second right past a school to T junc. TR onto A356? - the road I came into Crewkerne on off the A30 - go about 4 miles and turn round, back towards Crewkerne and at some point TL onto a narrow country lane which brings you back to the Yeovil road - the first junction on your right if you turn right out of the factory.
Reply
Old May 18, 2012 | 04:55 AM
  #22  
Polemicist's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,326
Likes: 1
From: Ulaanbaatar
Default

I don't like them; they're cars for bedwetters.
Reply
Old May 18, 2012 | 05:18 AM
  #23  
blue monster's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,711
Likes: 5
From: Sunny south Manchester
Default

Originally Posted by Polemicist
I don't like them; they're cars for bedwetters.
Kind of agree as I nearly sh1t myself
Reply
Old May 18, 2012 | 06:27 AM
  #24  
Nottm_S2's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23,299
Likes: 832
From: Nottingham
Default

I love them being a rubbish biker this would suit me down to the ground but i'm way too tight, my bike only cost £7k for similar straight line performance though i do not doubt for a half a millisecond this would destroy any lap time i could set on a track
Reply
Old May 18, 2012 | 06:29 AM
  #25  
Welshman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,794
Likes: 1
From: La Massana, Principat D'Andorra
Default

Originally Posted by Polemicist
I don't like them; they're cars for bedwetters.
I only got out of the habit when I was 37!
Reply
Old May 18, 2012 | 06:32 AM
  #26  
keith2.2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,627
Likes: 0
From: Herts
Default

I'd be more than happy to get a plastic fitted sheet and revert to wetting the bed if it was the only thing standing between me and ownership.
Reply
Old May 18, 2012 | 06:34 AM
  #27  
Ultra_Nexus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 12,330
Likes: 0
From: Frustration
Default

Originally Posted by Welshman
Originally Posted by Ultra_Nexus' timestamp='1337339244' post='21709179
The thing is that they are ridiculously expensive for what you get IMHO.

16" wheels are a tad daft too because they are such an awkward size for tyres (as in expensive).

How did you find the tendency to spin the rear wheels going straight?
You don't rationalise a purchase of such a car. Let's face it a Mondeo will get you from A to B as fast as a BMW, Merc or Jag, 95% of the time, but I've only ever driven BMWs, Mercs or Jags. A £2k Beretta shotgun will shoot just as straight as any more expensive shotgun, but I don't shoot a base model Beretta. You're here for a good time, not for a long time.

I shouldn't think the 16" are any more expensive to source tyres for than the standard 15" rims.

On a dry road I found no tendency at all to spin the wheels either in a straight line or round the corners. As I said the car has massive mechanical grip. On a wet or damp road considerable discretion would be required, but that's something I'm entirely familiar with.
I can appreciate that, but cars like these aren't really bought for image...are they?

16's are more expensive than 15s. 30% more expensive!

Yeah, I figured as much. I spoke to someone who drove one who was telling me they were getting wheelspin in the first 3 gears where as my Westfield doesn't wheelspin at all in a straight line and that has a 50/50 weight distribution, not a rear heavy one.
Reply
Old May 18, 2012 | 07:34 AM
  #28  
Welshman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,794
Likes: 1
From: La Massana, Principat D'Andorra
Default

Originally Posted by Ultra_Nexus
Originally Posted by Welshman' timestamp='1337339882' post='21709194
[quote name='Ultra_Nexus' timestamp='1337339244' post='21709179']
The thing is that they are ridiculously expensive for what you get IMHO.

16" wheels are a tad daft too because they are such an awkward size for tyres (as in expensive).

How did you find the tendency to spin the rear wheels going straight?
You don't rationalise a purchase of such a car. Let's face it a Mondeo will get you from A to B as fast as a BMW, Merc or Jag, 95% of the time, but I've only ever driven BMWs, Mercs or Jags. A £2k Beretta shotgun will shoot just as straight as any more expensive shotgun, but I don't shoot a base model Beretta. You're here for a good time, not for a long time.

I shouldn't think the 16" are any more expensive to source tyres for than the standard 15" rims.

On a dry road I found no tendency at all to spin the wheels either in a straight line or round the corners. As I said the car has massive mechanical grip. On a wet or damp road considerable discretion would be required, but that's something I'm entirely familiar with.
I can appreciate that, but cars like these aren't really bought for image...are they?

16's are more expensive than 15s. 30% more expensive!

Yeah, I figured as much. I spoke to someone who drove one who was telling me they were getting wheelspin in the first 3 gears where as my Westfield doesn't wheelspin at all in a straight line and that has a 50/50 weight distribution, not a rear heavy one.
[/quote]

Well I've always liked the looks, and was looking for a car equivalent of a bike..but I couldn't care less what image it projects to anyone else.

Just checked on the tyre price - you're right! But if the difference for a full set amounts to around £150, I can live with that.

I imagine you can wheelspin it if you so desire. Perhaps its my bike experience but rear wheel spinning I try to avoid.
Reply
Old May 18, 2012 | 07:39 AM
  #29  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

No - congratulations, you mad bugger!

What exactly is the advantage of 16"s? Greater width or a shallower sidewall?
Reply
Old May 18, 2012 | 08:31 AM
  #30  
Welshman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,794
Likes: 1
From: La Massana, Principat D'Andorra
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Graves
No - congratulations, you mad bugger!

What exactly is the advantage of 16"s? Greater width or a shallower sidewall?
Nick, thanks.

Let me be honest. I've no idea - but they look nicer
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:49 AM.