The Corner House of Whores and Monkeys. Enter for Fun & Shenanigans! We're weird here. In the most awesome way possible.

$50 a year for a webiste that seldom

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 09:23 PM
  #121  
wicky's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,828
Likes: 74
From: stuffed in a box
Default

shut up already.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 09:47 PM
  #122  
tokyo_james's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 65,827
Likes: 2
From: FCUK
Default

Originally Posted by BITSA,Jun 9 2006, 11:24 AM

Yet another say-nothing "statement."

Memo to Dave and Mike: If indeed it is true that S2KI's technical difficulties are not ultimately grounded in a lack of money and therefore paid members (a possibility that I am more than just open to), then you need demonstrate to the readership the way or ways in which Cthree mismanages this site. Be (very) specific.
Oh for God's sake PLEASE shut up
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2006 | 03:06 AM
  #123  
zdave87's Avatar
Member
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 82,468
Likes: 1,193
Default

Reply
Old Jun 9, 2006 | 03:14 AM
  #124  
Mocky's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 105,828
Likes: 152
Default

still going...


Reply
Old Jun 9, 2006 | 05:49 AM
  #125  
Metalhead's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
From: So Cali
Default

Originally Posted by zdave87,Jun 9 2006, 03:06 AM
Hey, Dave, Mike's the one who, on June 7th, resurrected this thread after it had laid dormant for some four days (a state of inactivity that I was more than happy with).

That said, Dave, your " " was an excellent way of saying that you cannot possibly demonstrate to the readership any sort of mismanagement on Cthree's behalf. Ergo, Dave, unless Mike is able to illustrate accordingly, then we can only assume that Cthree and xviper are indeed correct: that this forum's technical problems are clearly and firmly rooted in a lack of memberships and, therefore, money.

https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.ph...T&f=1&t=376100


***

Persevere.
Guy
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2006 | 07:22 AM
  #126  
Metalhead's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
From: So Cali
Default

Bumped for the edification of those able to show exactly how it is that S2KI.com is being "mismanaged" - those able to show that this site's technical problems are "not" grounded in a lack of individuals willing to pay for that which they use.

https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.ph...T&f=1&t=376100


Thank you.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2006 | 07:42 AM
  #127  
zdave87's Avatar
Member
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 82,468
Likes: 1,193
Default

It looks to me that cthree is doing as much as he can to fix the problems.



cthree
It is my unfortunate #1 priority to have the site be as fast as possible. We are running on our old database server because I can't get the new one to not crash repeatedly. We'll reinstall yet another version of LINUX on it and see if it holds up. changing the backup server through off much of the optimization changes we made on other servers which performed horribly under the backup server. I had to re-optimize everything and I think I've finally found the sweet spot.
cthree
[QUOTE]What changed is all of the servers were replaced, 4 new ones added, the httpd server changed from apache to lighttpd, php was changed from v4 to v5, mysql was changed from v4.1 to 5.0. Plenty of opportunity for lots of bitchy problems and lots of tuning issues like:- the new dual opteron database server won't run for more than 12 hours without hanging using both 32 and 64 bit versions of 2 different linux distributions. Hence why the site was going offline regularly. I switched it back to the dual Xeon it replaced which overloads it but at least it doesn't crash.
- lighttpd with 4 load balanced servers running php/fastcgi was running fine but was spitting out errors about clients timing out sending files. To eliminate the errors I increased the write timeout limit from 30s to 300s which worked but had the side effect of causing a large number of open and dead connections waiting for 5 minutes for clients that went away, that's why it was slow for the past couple of days. I made some tuning changes and fixed both issues and that's why it's fast again.
When I change parameters I don't know how things will change until I get a chance to see what happens over time so it can take a day or two to dial it in. the traffic at 1AM is not the same as at 1PM and what looks good in the evening could be big problems midday.
It's just the way it goes and yes it was most definitely broken.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2006 | 08:58 AM
  #128  
wicky's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,828
Likes: 74
From: stuffed in a box
Default

Hey Bitsa.

Membership is OPTIONAL.

Now shut up.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2006 | 10:34 AM
  #129  
mikes2k's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 88,444
Likes: 21
From: Pt. A to Pt. B via VTEC!!
Default

Originally Posted by zdave87,Jun 9 2006, 11:42 AM
It looks to me that cthree is doing as much as he can to fix the problems.



cthree


cthree


cthree


cthree
Sounds like a lot of technical issues :cough: ESO to me.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2006 | 04:28 PM
  #130  
s2ktarga's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

I wanna argue!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:58 AM.