Apparently (II) ...

Closed Thread Subscribe

Thread Tools

Nov 2, 2004 | 02:05 PM

#1181

DERF

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 2,881

Likes: 0

From: Da Zoo

Apparently YES

= there kickin me out of work.

= work was slow and payday is going to Suck

if things don't pick up

Nov 2, 2004 | 02:11 PM

#1182

Superbabe

Registered User

Joined: Sep 2003

Posts: 8,046

Likes: 0

From: Apparently WAY OUT

Apparently you've picked up enough shiet for a while

Like that P-disease

Nov 2, 2004 | 02:13 PM

#1183

jedwards

Joined: Jul 2001

Posts: 28,318

Likes: 9

From: This is not my house!

Quote:

Originally Posted by DERF,Nov 2 2004, 02:40 PM

Dr. V every time I type the letter P it hurts, Wus Up

LMFAO!!!!!!!!

Nov 2, 2004 | 02:40 PM

#1184

WestSideBilly

Joined: May 2001

Posts: 93,305

Likes: 820

From: Nowhere

Quote:

Originally Posted by jedwards,Nov 2 2004, 04:19 PM

Billy you're reading the news too much. FLA and OH aren't deciding any more than Indiana or Cali. If Cali changed it's vote it would impact the election just as much. When there is a tie in the Senate and the VP comes to vote... he (/she) doesn't determine the outcome any more than any one of the Senators who voted... otherwise there wouldn't be a tie... etc.

I was referring more to historical monarchs of the time of our independance from England, who often ruled absolutely with only a legion of fairly agreeable nobles to slow him down. Modern monarchies are not all that different from our system; Canada and England are both good examples.

You're right, in a way - however the EC marginalizes most states, which was my point. The states that, for whatever reason, have come to have a near 50% split between conservative minds and liberal minds, ultimately have a greater impact on the surprise of the election results. Nobody is questioning Indiana or California's outcome.