The Corner House of Whores and Monkeys. Enter for Fun & Shenanigans! We're weird here. In the most awesome way possible.

ATTN: BITSA

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 10:02 PM
  #261  
UnkieTrunkie's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 109,425
Likes: 1,648
From: SJC
Default

Ahhh perhaps. . . but your genius Wick lies in the fact that you're pragmatically lazy; leading to a strange state of also being. . . pragmatically stupid?

Why did I use the word 'pragmatic?'
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 10:04 PM
  #262  
wicky's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,828
Likes: 74
From: stuffed in a box
Default

stupid is a rather harsh word.

stupid people also typically lack application, an area, I must say, in which I am quite the overachiever. which is a big word.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 10:14 PM
  #263  
UnkieTrunkie's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 109,425
Likes: 1,648
From: SJC
Default

Originally Posted by wicky,Jul 23 2006, 10:04 PM
stupid is a rather harsh word.
Your word, not mine.

[QUOTE]stupid people also typically lack application, an area, I must say, in which I am quite the overachiever.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 10:25 PM
  #264  
wicky's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,828
Likes: 74
From: stuffed in a box
Default

Originally Posted by 8D_In_Trunk,Jul 23 2006, 11:14 PM
Your word, not mine.
Originally Posted by 8D_In_Trunk,Jul 23 2006, 11:02 PM
...... pragmatically stupid? ....
*ahem*

Originally Posted by 8D_In_Trunk,Jul 23 2006, 11:14 PM
Does this make you an underachiever, or am I arriving at that through conjecture?
I don't know what that means...
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 10:44 PM
  #265  
UnkieTrunkie's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 109,425
Likes: 1,648
From: SJC
Default

Originally Posted by wicky,Jul 23 2006, 09:59 PM
I'm also lazy, not just stupid....
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 10:46 PM
  #266  
wicky's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,828
Likes: 74
From: stuffed in a box
Default

hmmmm. that is a substantial arguement.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 10:48 PM
  #267  
wicky's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,828
Likes: 74
From: stuffed in a box
Default

I believe however, being that the quote you have refers to a post with exceeds the 3 post read back rule that it is inadmissable as evidence.

I therefore deny your motion.

My previous post to your post stands.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 10:49 PM
  #268  
wicky's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,828
Likes: 74
From: stuffed in a box
Default

*which
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 07:11 AM
  #269  
mikes2k's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 88,444
Likes: 21
From: Pt. A to Pt. B via VTEC!!
Default

Originally Posted by wicky,Jul 23 2006, 11:46 PM


Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 04:39 PM
  #270  
UnkieTrunkie's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 109,425
Likes: 1,648
From: SJC
Default

Originally Posted by wicky,Jul 23 2006, 10:48 PM
I believe however, being that the quote you have refers to a post with exceeds the 3 post read back rule that it is inadmissable as evidence.

I therefore deny your motion.

My previous post to your post stands.
I'd like to submit to your eminence:
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:28 PM.