CornerCon '04
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 65,827
Likes: 2
From: FCUK
Originally posted by wicky
thanks..... for what it's worth, that page I posted favours a wider spread of PON to RON numbers, I've seen 100 quoted as low as 94, so I'm not exactly sure what is truly acurate, but base on what I've, this page I linked is a best (or worst, depending) case scenario.......
thanks..... for what it's worth, that page I posted favours a wider spread of PON to RON numbers, I've seen 100 quoted as low as 94, so I'm not exactly sure what is truly acurate, but base on what I've, this page I linked is a best (or worst, depending) case scenario.......
So in fact what you are trying to say is that the figures that you posted were complete BOLLOX and no one is any the wiser as to what the real difference is .......
Former Moderator
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 52,827
Likes: 17
From: State of Confusion
Originally posted by tokyo_james
I didn't know we were supposed to be helping .......
I didn't know we were supposed to be helping .......