View Poll Results: Dane Cook vs Dave Chapelle
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll
Dane Cook vs Dave Chapelle IV
Originally Posted by bluezeke,Mar 7 2007, 04:04 PM
And what of these?
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=398698
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=468383
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=468113
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=52493
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=456538
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=461280
Missing spam and : : and

https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=398698
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=468383
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=468113
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=52493
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=456538
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=461280
Missing spam and : : and


Second one: A nonsensical poll may be added to add emphasis to a post that does not need a poll. Your post required a poll, therefore it must follow the protocal.
Third one: See above
Fourth One: A post from 2002? Really, you had to go back 5 years to find a legitamate example? Does that not really prove OUR point?

Fith one: Why not scroll down a little to THIS post: https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showt...dpost&p=9591711
Sixth one: Did you see the response he got to this poll?
Originally Posted by ruexp67,Mar 7 2007, 05:11 PM
First one: Posted by a corner hottie. All rules do not apply to corner hotties, we feel honored by their presence so they can do as they please.
Second one: A nonsensical poll may be added to add emphasis to a post that does not need a poll. Your post required a poll, therefore it must follow the protocal.
Third one: See above
Fourth One: A post from 2002? Really, you had to go back 5 years to find a legitamate example? Does that not really prove OUR point?
Fith one: Why not scroll down a little to THIS post: https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showt...dpost&p=9591711
Sixth one: Did you see the response he got to this poll?
Second one: A nonsensical poll may be added to add emphasis to a post that does not need a poll. Your post required a poll, therefore it must follow the protocal.
Third one: See above
Fourth One: A post from 2002? Really, you had to go back 5 years to find a legitamate example? Does that not really prove OUR point?

Fith one: Why not scroll down a little to THIS post: https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showt...dpost&p=9591711
Sixth one: Did you see the response he got to this poll?

















