Semi-Official "I'm" Thread XI
Originally Posted by NikePenguin,Nov 17 2004, 02:34 PM
I'm more inclined to go with 3 lenses to cover 28-200 than with 2.
Originally Posted by WestSideBilly,Nov 17 2004, 12:50 PM
I'm saying in a perfect world that makes sense... but 3 lenses to cover 28-200 cost more than 2 lenses to cover 28-200. Money no object, I'd want the 18-55 that comes with Nancy's camera (which I want to get as well), a 10-22 ultra wide, a 28-105 for mid range, and a 100-400 telephoto with the image stabilization. But that's a lot of coin. 

But I would rather wait to buy the lenses I really want than to skimp. I know I'd be happier in the long run (and might save money by not replacing lenses I do not like).







