Fabulous.



I think.


Wanna change the subject again?

 

Naked hoes. Mo of them, specifically.




Discuss.

 

None here. . . as is the usual. Gonna have to go back to Los Gatos.

 

Why must they be naked? Isn't there some allure/mystery in being partially covered?
Is wanting mo a reflection of your expected white, male privilege and sense of entitlement?
And what if there *are* more? Perhaps they would collaborate and rebel against institutionalized oppression? Then what?
Who decides whether they are hoes? And should we consider our language when describing this population?




I know, TL,DR. Orrrrr too lame for the Corner.

 

I'm thinking you could slow pitch these to Ask Unkie Trunkie. . .

 

No slow pitch. It's hardball time.

 

Just let me know what the safe word is.

 

I actually use two words: Aloysius Snuffleupagus.

 

Naked -> less work
Mo -> more to choose from, and yes I'm entitled to mo because I'm white and male.
Hoes -> less work

Basically, mo naked hoes = pick of the proverbial litter with least amount of effort required.

 

So less work for you is more important than quality or respecting the female gender?



Just checking.