and so the First Age of The Corner comes to a close......
Former Moderator
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 52,827
Likes: 17
From: State of Confusion
I can see your point, James. I have no opinion on the subject, really, so I'm just looking for some sort of consensus.
The downside to 50 is that as the threads start getting longer it'll take more time for them to load...but that's really only an issue for those on dial up, I think...
The downside to 50 is that as the threads start getting longer it'll take more time for them to load...but that's really only an issue for those on dial up, I think...
Former Moderator
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 52,827
Likes: 17
From: State of Confusion
Like I said, I don't really have an opinion. I'm just bringing up the pros and cons as I think of them.
Page length of 25 makes the Corner move faster, but also encourages thread hijacking of the less than desirable sort (like what MrForgetable and some others like to do to boost PPD).
Page length of 25 makes the Corner move faster, but also encourages thread hijacking of the less than desirable sort (like what MrForgetable and some others like to do to boost PPD).
, I'm gettin all teary eyed here..
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,828
Likes: 74
From: stuffed in a box
I vote 25.
pages load faster. The corner game at 2000 post and 50 post per page can only have half as many corner opportunity's than it does at 25 posts per page. Also, we were always set at the default before. Also this won't confuse any newcomers or people who don't happen to read this thread.
for the record.... I *prefer* 50 per page... but I'm trying to adapt.....
pages load faster. The corner game at 2000 post and 50 post per page can only have half as many corner opportunity's than it does at 25 posts per page. Also, we were always set at the default before. Also this won't confuse any newcomers or people who don't happen to read this thread.
for the record.... I *prefer* 50 per page... but I'm trying to adapt.....
