CORNER-OINKSKY

I don't think VMOM is going to appreciate you guys oinking up her thread.

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by WestSideBilly
[B]

Well, consider that 4 x 8 IP numbers (255.255.255.255) is just four 8 bits numbers, which is no different than a 32 bit number in terms of possible combinations (4.3 billion give or take).

 

BAH! It's fun to get her riled up.

How's things Kathy?

 

but if you run your Hex through a colinear algorythm you'll get radial accelaration of the hydrostatic subsurface (1/p + 1/f = 1/q). When this happens your binary load lifter bin will overflow it's protocol stack resulting in an appended bit length whereby your operator will either perform an unnecessary cycle or truncate the following operation, substituting it's header with the value of the previous operation's overflow potentially resulting in a runaway wormhole effect. An array would be useful in preventing this problem.







just had to bring that to the second page....

 

OUCH WICKY you made my head hurt

 

A 9mm to the face would solve your problem equally as well as an array would, Wickster.

 

actually the inherent energy loss in firing a 9mm bullet is highly inefficient compared to using an array......

 

 

due to reciprocating forces acting upon a resistive mass.....

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by tritium_pie
[B]

56??? you might need to check that calculator, bud.