View Poll Results: How many COs do we need
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll
How many COs do we need
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,252
Likes: 3
From: charlotte, nc
it is a tough call. 3 because we currently have 3, but we've been doing just fine with one active CO.
anyone can post a meet and that happens regularly.
for the sake of being simpler, i voted 2,
Frank, i was gonna leave this up for about a week and let it have time to be voted on but what do you think we should do once a # is decided. should we stick with that number or have nominations and then let people see who wants to be CO and decide on the number at that point, using this poll as more of a gauge?
anyone can post a meet and that happens regularly.
for the sake of being simpler, i voted 2,
Frank, i was gonna leave this up for about a week and let it have time to be voted on but what do you think we should do once a # is decided. should we stick with that number or have nominations and then let people see who wants to be CO and decide on the number at that point, using this poll as more of a gauge?
Former Moderator
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 20,371
Likes: 1
From: never never land
Originally Posted by suprmonky73,Feb 2 2009, 11:22 PM
it is a tough call. 3 because we currently have 3, but we've been doing just fine with one active CO.
anyone can post a meet and that happens regularly.
for the sake of being simpler, i voted 2,
Frank, i was gonna leave this up for about a week and let it have time to be voted on but what do you think we should do once a # is decided. should we stick with that number or have nominations and then let people see who wants to be CO and decide on the number at that point, using this poll as more of a gauge?
anyone can post a meet and that happens regularly.
for the sake of being simpler, i voted 2,
Frank, i was gonna leave this up for about a week and let it have time to be voted on but what do you think we should do once a # is decided. should we stick with that number or have nominations and then let people see who wants to be CO and decide on the number at that point, using this poll as more of a gauge?
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 2
From: allentown
3 because:
a--geography
b--a little less time commitment because of shared responsibilities
c--if 1 CO would have to step down because of other commitments or priorities it doesn't throw all the load onto one person.
a--geography
b--a little less time commitment because of shared responsibilities
c--if 1 CO would have to step down because of other commitments or priorities it doesn't throw all the load onto one person.
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: Doylestown, PA
Originally Posted by tinkfist,Feb 2 2009, 08:07 PM
Size wise - 2, Geographically - 3. IMO geographically trumps size due to the fact that a CO would probably be more willing to organize something closer to home rather than closer to the population centers.
I voted for 3.
I voted for 3.
absolutely on point tom. delval covers quite a large area and we have members not only in the middle, but also in every corner it seems. having three active co's that are preferably spread out somewhat in the community should strike a good balance - enough to share the workload and help grow the community but without having too many cooks in the kitchen, so to speak...
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,802
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by tinkfist,Feb 2 2009, 11:07 PM
Size wise - 2, Geographically - 3. IMO geographically trumps size due to the fact that a CO would probably be more willing to organize something closer to home rather than closer to the population centers.
I voted for 3.
I voted for 3.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
From: Titusville
Originally Posted by jfo,Feb 3 2009, 11:33 AM
3 because:
a--geography
b--a little less time commitment because of shared responsibilities
c--if 1 CO would have to step down because of other commitments or priorities it doesn't throw all the load onto one person.
a--geography
b--a little less time commitment because of shared responsibilities
c--if 1 CO would have to step down because of other commitments or priorities it doesn't throw all the load onto one person.
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
From: Dub C, PA
Originally Posted by jfo,Feb 3 2009, 10:33 AM
3 because:
a--geography
b--a little less time commitment because of shared responsibilities
c--if 1 CO would have to step down because of other commitments or priorities it doesn't throw all the load onto one person.
a--geography
b--a little less time commitment because of shared responsibilities
c--if 1 CO would have to step down because of other commitments or priorities it doesn't throw all the load onto one person.
on this as well.