Dinner and a Movie Discuss your favorite movies foods, restaurants and recipies.

ALEXANDER

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 25, 2004 | 03:28 PM
  #1  
TriaXenginE's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,505
Likes: 0
Default ALEXANDER

One of the worst movies i have ever seen in my life. It was crap. The acting was sub-par, the camera work sucked, the special effects blew.

Colin Farrell can't act himself out of a paper bag, Sir Anothony Hopkins' career just jumped the shark.

They over-played the homo-sexual side waaaaay too much. I'm not a gay-basher, but they went into these relationships without developing too much. Colin Farrell does Jared Leto, Colin Farrell does some real effeminate dude, plenty of man love to go around amongst his generals too. The story was stale as hell, it was trying to re-iterate history, but it was such a weak rendition.

Angelina Jolie, was the one who only acted well, i think she gave light to such a bleak film.

I wish i could get those 3+ hours of my life back and my money, but sadly i can't.



They're calling this movie an "Epic". yeah..............an epic flop.

No where near Gladiator. I woulda watched Troy 2 times instead. That's how bad, Alexander was. OMG.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2004 | 01:12 AM
  #2  
tritium_pie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,543
Likes: 0
From: Vegas baby!!
Default

sorry you wasted your money, but thanks for warning us away from that apparently shit-bad movie.

I like the "jumped the shark" metaphoric reference.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2004 | 07:32 AM
  #3  
RotoRooter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: ???
Default

yeah, thanks for the tip. I wouldn't wanna spend 3 hours in the theater watching gay sex
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2004 | 09:18 PM
  #4  
Poindexter's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,162
Likes: 3
From: Burlington, VT
Default

Originally Posted by TriaXenginE,Nov 25 2004, 07:28 PM
One of the worst movies i have ever seen in my life. It was crap. The acting was sub-par, the camera work sucked, the special effects blew.

Colin Farrell can't act himself out of a paper bag, Sir Anothony Hopkins' career just jumped the shark.

They over-played the homo-sexual side waaaaay too much. I'm not a gay-basher, but they went into these relationships without developing too much. Colin Farrell does Jared Leto, Colin Farrell does some real effeminate dude, plenty of man love to go around amongst his generals too. The story was stale as hell, it was trying to re-iterate history, but it was such a weak rendition.

Angelina Jolie, was the one who only acted well, i think she gave light to such a bleak film.

I wish i could get those 3+ hours of my life back and my money, but sadly i can't.



They're calling this movie an "Epic". yeah..............an epic flop.

No where near Gladiator. I woulda watched Troy 2 times instead. That's how bad, Alexander was. OMG.
You summed it up perfectly - I just got back and was thinking what should I post about this movie, then I came across yours: my thoughts exactly.

The only good thing in this movie was Angelina Jolie - even though I don't think she is the greatest actress in the business, she is definitely the best thing in this movie (and looked great ).......especially the close ups on her lips

I just want to say thank you to tenblade for putting together another fun night with the S crew, but on the movie.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2004 | 12:42 PM
  #5  
dave22's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,065
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Default

In addition to what has been said above, anyone who doesn't want to see Colin Farrell's nuts should avoid this movie.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2004 | 01:26 PM
  #6  
GpLhenS2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RotoRooter,Nov 26 2004, 08:32 AM
yeah, thanks for the tip. I wouldn't wanna spend 3 hours in the theater watching gay sex
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2004 | 04:36 PM
  #7  
SEVNT4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,537
Likes: 0
From: Intercontinental
Default

Could not agree more with TriaXenginE & Poindexter.

The accents were hilarious. You'd think the Scottish/Irish people conquered the Greeks. I was waiting for Sean Connery to come out and say, "I will sh*t on yourrr throne and take away your kingdom."

Angelina Jolie, nice! Rosario Dawson. Hello ladies...

The documentary on the history channel was a better spent 3 hours with much more info and more entertaining than the overplayed scenes in this movie.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2004 | 04:46 PM
  #8  
hapa's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 0
From: Terrebonne
Default

thanks for the tip...I haven't heard one positive thing about that movie!
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 06:54 AM
  #9  
tenblade2001's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,280
Likes: 1
From: knoxville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by TriaXenginE,Nov 25 2004, 07:28 PM
One of the worst movies i have ever seen in my life. It was crap. The acting was sub-par, the camera work sucked, the special effects blew.

Colin Farrell can't act himself out of a paper bag, Sir Anothony Hopkins' career just jumped the shark.

They over-played the homo-sexual side waaaaay too much. I'm not a gay-basher, but they went into these relationships without developing too much. Colin Farrell does Jared Leto, Colin Farrell does some real effeminate dude, plenty of man love to go around amongst his generals too. The story was stale as hell, it was trying to re-iterate history, but it was such a weak rendition.

Angelina Jolie, was the one who only acted well, i think she gave light to such a bleak film.

I wish i could get those 3+ hours of my life back and my money, but sadly i can't.



They're calling this movie an "Epic". yeah..............an epic flop.

No where near Gladiator. I woulda watched Troy 2 times instead. That's how bad, Alexander was. OMG.
I agree with phucko on this one. Here's what I'll add:
1) Colin Farrell did a good job, but he had a sh*tty script to work with (garbage in = garbage out).
2) The gayness was waaaaaay over played. Oliver Stone just needs to come out of the closet and admit he's into man-love. They keep drawing comparisons to Achilles and Patrochles but there is no proof, only speculation, that they were lovers. While some scholars insist they were, others insist that they were not..that, in fact, Patrocles was like a cousin or little brother; hence Achilles rage when he is slain. Now, with regards to Alexander, all we have is speculation. Some say that he sometimes took men as lovers (was pretty common back then) but had a ravenous appetite for females as well; if not more so.
Unfortunately, there is little information about the person i.e. written first hand accounts. We're getting our information from oral history that was written down...sometime hundreds or thousands of years after the fact. This leaves a lot of room for bias when interpreting the story.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 05:34 PM
  #10  
silk2k's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Default

this movie SUCKS!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:40 AM.