When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
to be honest , i wasnt impressed , chase scences were too hard too follow ( bad camera work) .
the movie just lacked "mojo" i tried to like it ... but left dissapointed . The bad guy just wasnt bad enough IMO and he didnt have a trade mark defect either , which is uncool ehehhee
i dont think you can quality Olga as a "Bond girl" cause Bond didnt shag her
and is it just me . or the villian looks just like Rupert from the Hello Deli from the Late show ?
if his name wasn't bond and M wasn't in it, you would never know it was a bond movie. What happened to Q explaining his cool gadgets and car. and where the hell is the theme song!!! This applies for both casino royal and QOS.
and is it just me . or the villian looks just like Rupert from the Hello Deli from the Late show ?
I turned to my wife and said it looks like Ben Linus from Lost and Steve Buschemi had a kid together.
I saw, I liked but yeah the car chase was too short and needed more tension. The figth scene with the chains and the scaffolding was shot way to close up and over edited. A pull back shot would have been so much better there too.
Originally Posted by omgitsoop,Nov 15 2008, 02:54 AM
some action sequences were a little overedited, and the plane scene made no sense to me, but awesome overall. the title sequence/song is awesome
Yeah, the plane chase really didn't do anything for me either. The noticeable lack of gadgets kinda bummed me out too.
On another note, the people sitting beside us in the theatre must never have seen a Bond movie before. Throughout the movie they were saying things like, "Oh that's ridiculous!" and "That's SO unrealistic." Ummm....YEAH that's what Bond is all about!