Engine Swaps Discussion of alternate engine swaps into the S2000 other than F20/22. K24, 2JZ, V6, V8 etc...

Frame cross-member removal and stability/rigidity

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 3, 2018 | 10:07 AM
  #1  
Dklein's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota
Default Frame cross-member removal and stability/rigidity

Happy New Year.

We are just starting on an LS-2 swap for my 2001 AP1 S2000 (with 190,000 miles). With the engine out, and with cross member removal very soon, I am concerned about frame rigidity loss. The Import Muscle kit instructions say that the LSx engine when rigidly mounted forms the segmental replacement for the removed structural support.

Is this what people recommend? The rectangular box beam is quite stiff. For an open car like the S2000, it bothers me to remove structural frame elements. Has anyone reinstalled tubular cross members or similar, after placement of the LSx engine, with or without rubber or rigid engine mounts?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2018 | 10:32 AM
  #2  
V3rtigo's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 59
Likes: 11
Default

The IM solid mount ties the two rails back together and you still have the crash beam farther forward so I wouldn't be concerned about it.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2018 | 09:51 AM
  #3  
CoolGuy094's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 10
Default

Many people who remove the front cross brace (whether they be swap or turbo guys) fabricate a tubular replacement. I have a rectangular box tube with flanges on the end to make it bolt-in and removable. However, I did not use the IM engine mounts to rigid mount the motor to the frame; I used more traditional poly mounts. So I felt like I needed the rigidity of a brace.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2018 | 09:54 AM
  #4  
CoolGuy094's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 10
Default

This was the final design.

Attachment 156735

This was a previous design that didn't work out due to coolant line clearances. I liked the look of this one better.

Attachment 156736
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2018 | 06:06 PM
  #5  
Dklein's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota
Default

Which polyurethane mounts did you use, and are you happy with them? The rigid mount just seems like it's asking for vibration and component loosening-problems down the road. There is a reason that manufacturers use engine mounts, I guess, both to avoid shaking the passengers and to avoid vibrating car components loose?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2018 | 11:11 AM
  #6  
CoolGuy094's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 10
Default

The engine-side mounts were from a dude going by the brand name Alloywerks. They utilize the Hasport S2000 subframe-side poly mounts. I'm very happy with the poly mounts, the NHV is minimal to none. The Alloywerks mounts were less than ideal... they created some starter, header, and dip stick interference issues that I was able to work around, but still was a pain. In hindsight, I'd probably just try to make my own engine-side mounts to adapt to the same Hasport poly mounts.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2018 | 08:04 AM
  #7  
Luder94's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 12,904
Likes: 93
From: Big Box suburb, IL
Default

Any thought to weld up some radiator brackets to your design cross-beam? It'd allow for an angled mounting position so that an intake tube and filter could be sneaked around to the front of the radiator, large air guide for more air to travel through fascia opening and through the radiator out the way of a vented hood, and maybe get better radiator hose routing.

I really like the feature of being able to be bolted in and out. If you happen to fab one up, would you mind fabbing two of them up; ideally using aluminum.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2018 | 01:28 PM
  #8  
theprophet36's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 924
Likes: 22
From: Central CT
Default

Originally Posted by Luder94
Any thought to weld up some radiator brackets to your design cross-beam? It'd allow for an angled mounting position so that an intake tube and filter could be sneaked around to the front of the radiator, large air guide for more air to travel through fascia opening and through the radiator out the way of a vented hood, and maybe get better radiator hose routing.

I really like the feature of being able to be bolted in and out. If you happen to fab one up, would you mind fabbing two of them up; ideally using aluminum.

Like the Samberg setup for RX7/LS swap. That would be great on the S2k!!
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2019 | 06:50 PM
  #9  
osms.io's Avatar
Registered User
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 123
Likes: 9
Default Resurrection of this thread

Not taking any credit for it. One of my friends is (was) a Miata guy. Before throwing flames. His Miata was arguably one of the best built 400+ whp beasts. He is also a mechanical engineer by trade.

In prep for a kswap he came up with an idea. If I pull it off I will be sure to respond back.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2019 | 06:51 PM
  #10  
osms.io's Avatar
Registered User
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 123
Likes: 9
Default Attachments??

Originally Posted by CoolGuy094
This was the final design.



This was a previous design that didn't work out due to coolant line clearances. I liked the look of this one better.

Do you have exports of this? File type?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:11 AM.