Hard at Work Mid-A Off-topic Playground.

#@$%$86th Hard at Work Thread#$@#$

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 06:51 AM
  #1441  
WhrDLMI's Avatar
Community Organizer
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 101,548
Likes: 4,899
From: Leesburg, VA
Default

Say you have this colleague... They promise to do something and they really try to get it done but hose it up all royal like... So bad you have to spend all sorts of time (2x as much as would be necessary if they had done it right the first time) to get it all sorted out.

Are you allowed to be pissed at them???
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 06:53 AM
  #1442  
CrazyCracker82's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 42,116
Likes: 31
From: Over the Electric Grapevine.....man
Default

Originally Posted by WhrDLMI,Nov 6 2006, 10:51 AM
Say you have this colleague... They promise to do something and they really try to get it done but hose it up all royal like... So bad you have to spend all sorts of time (2x as much as would be necessary if they had done it right the first time) to get it all sorted out.

Are you allowed to be pissed at them???
rhetorical question?
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 06:53 AM
  #1443  
S2KinVA's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE... literally :)
Default

Originally Posted by cap1,Nov 6 2006, 10:48 AM
I hear Ya over at Inline is building a 2.7L in his car ....
Yep, he has a thread going in the FI forum I think. Thats crazy, pushing a 2.0 to 2.7, getting a little thin!
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 06:56 AM
  #1444  
bighead's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,401
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, Virginia
Default

scenario: project is already over budget due to a horrible application that didn't scale well, takes hours to query and only allows 1 person on at a time (access db)

do you:

a. Go into the red more and redevelop it, putting more scalability into it, using SQL server instead of access and redesigning the data tables or

b. Continue using the almost unusable app and go further into the red, just not all at the same time.

This is an unsupported application so no scheduled releases, etc... More or less just a DB of specific clinics in the US.

You're the manager, what do you do?
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 06:56 AM
  #1445  
speed_bump's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 24,687
Likes: 195
From: MoCo
Default

Originally Posted by WhrDLMI,Nov 6 2006, 10:51 AM
Say you have this colleague... They promise to do something and they really try to get it done but hose it up all royal like... So bad you have to spend all sorts of time (2x as much as would be necessary if they had done it right the first time) to get it all sorted out.

Are you allowed to be pissed at them???
UH Yes, unless you told them not to bother you so they couldn;t ask questions.
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 06:58 AM
  #1446  
speed_bump's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 24,687
Likes: 195
From: MoCo
Default

Originally Posted by bighead2,Nov 6 2006, 10:56 AM
scenario: project is already over budget due to a horrible application that didn't scale well, takes hours to query and only allows 1 person on at a time (access db)

do you:

a. Go into the red more and redevelop it, putting more scalability into it, using SQL server instead of access and redesigning the data tables or

b. Continue using the almost unusable app and go further into the red, just not all at the same time.

This is an unsupported application so no scheduled releases, etc... More or less just a DB of specific clinics in the US.

You're the manager, what do you do?
If you have a SQL server, try porting it to SQL with an Access front end and see what happens.
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 06:58 AM
  #1447  
bighead's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,401
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by WhrDLMI,Nov 6 2006, 10:51 AM
Say you have this colleague... They promise to do something and they really try to get it done but hose it up all royal like... So bad you have to spend all sorts of time (2x as much as would be necessary if they had done it right the first time) to get it all sorted out.

Are you allowed to be pissed at them???
I say no. if they tried their best and messed up, you can't be mad, they tried... was this a favor asked or is it in their normal job responsibilities?
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 07:02 AM
  #1448  
bighead's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,401
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by speed_bump,Nov 6 2006, 10:58 AM
If you have a SQL server, try porting it to SQL with an Access front end and see what happens.
seems logical.
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 07:03 AM
  #1449  
WhrDLMI's Avatar
Community Organizer
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 101,548
Likes: 4,899
From: Leesburg, VA
Default

Originally Posted by CrazyCracker82,Nov 6 2006, 10:53 AM
rhetorical question?
Eh... Not really.

I very much want to get pissed at this person. She took on a job that she never should have taken on. Got it about 70% there, but now I have to go in and fix the last 30%.

The problem is that it is going to take me 200% longer to fix the 30% than if I had done the 100% to begin with...

My ethical conundrum comes from the facts that a) she is a very nice person and really tried to do the work and b) the task is really small and inconsequential (until it has to be fixed).

I think I am just going to internalize my frustration, fix the issue, and put it behind me.

For the record, I am really :kirk:'d tho...
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 07:04 AM
  #1450  
WhrDLMI's Avatar
Community Organizer
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 101,548
Likes: 4,899
From: Leesburg, VA
Default

Originally Posted by speed_bump,Nov 6 2006, 10:56 AM
UH Yes, unless you told them not to bother you so they couldn;t ask questions.
I never asked for it to be done and I was never aware that it was... uh... "completed." I have just been asked to fix it...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:57 PM.