Hard at Work Mid-A Off-topic Playground.

#!@$$266rd Official Hard At Work Thread#$%@%#

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 5, 2010 | 06:18 AM
  #11  
AngryTurtle's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 281,962
Likes: 442
From: Charleston, SC. \>
Default

Originally Posted by WhrDLMI,Feb 5 2010, 10:17 AM


GO BACK TO BUFYOURLOW.
yer storms fail
Old Feb 5, 2010 | 06:18 AM
  #12  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

Originally Posted by WhrDLMI,Feb 5 2010, 10:18 AM
WTF... Why am I hungry? It is SO not time for lunch yet.
Because somewhere a dude just took a bite of a Snickers.
Old Feb 5, 2010 | 06:20 AM
  #13  
speed_bump's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 24,687
Likes: 195
From: MoCo
Default

Old Feb 5, 2010 | 06:20 AM
  #14  
O-turn's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 167,020
Likes: 0
From: Naples, FL
Default

WAT WAT WAT
Old Feb 5, 2010 | 06:22 AM
  #15  
9k_on_occasion's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,033
Likes: 7
Default

http://www.erh.noaa.gov/lwx/Historic...md-winter.html

Top 20 Snowstorms in Baltimore: (1891-2006)
1 28.2 inches ... Feb. 15-18, 2003
2 26.5 inches ... Jan. 27-29, 1922
3 22.8 inches ... Feb. 11, 1983
4 22.5 inches ... Jan. 7-8, 1996
5 22.0 inches ... Mar. 29-30, 1942
6 21.4 inches ... Feb. 11-14, 1899
7 20.0 inches ... Feb. 18-19, 1979
8 16.0 inches ... Mar. 15-18, 1892
9 15.5 inches ... Feb. 15, 1958
10 14.9 inches ... Jan. 25, 2000
11 14.1 inches ... Dec. 11-12, 1960
12 13.1 inches ... Feb. 11-12, 2006
13 13.0 inches ... Mar. 5-7, 1962
14 12.3 inches ... Jan. 22, 1987
15 12.1 inches ... Jan. 30-31, 1966
16 12.0 inches ... Feb. 16-18, 1900
17 11.9 inches ... Mar. 13-14, 1993
18 11.7 inches ... Feb. 5-8, 1899
19 11.5 inches ... Dec. 17-18, 1932
20 11.5 inches ... Mar. 21-22, 1964
Old Feb 5, 2010 | 06:23 AM
  #16  
WhrDLMI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Community Organizer
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 101,552
Likes: 4,900
From: Leesburg, VA
Default

Originally Posted by FF2Skip,Feb 5 2010, 10:18 AM
Sex?
I'm not allowed. Literally doctor's orders.
Old Feb 5, 2010 | 06:25 AM
  #17  
Vadster's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 231,381
Likes: 5,250
From: Tain-uh-see
Default

NNNNNNNNNNNG
Old Feb 5, 2010 | 06:26 AM
  #18  
AngryTurtle's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 281,962
Likes: 442
From: Charleston, SC. \>
Default

Originally Posted by 9k_on_occasion,Feb 5 2010, 10:22 AM
http://www.erh.noaa.gov/lwx/Historic...md-winter.html

Top 20 Snowstorms in Baltimore: (1891-2006)
1 28.2 inches ... Feb. 15-18, 2003
2 26.5 inches ... Jan. 27-29, 1922
3 22.8 inches ... Feb. 11, 1983
4 22.5 inches ... Jan. 7-8, 1996
5 22.0 inches ... Mar. 29-30, 1942
6 21.4 inches ... Feb. 11-14, 1899
7 20.0 inches ... Feb. 18-19, 1979
8 16.0 inches ... Mar. 15-18, 1892
9 15.5 inches ... Feb. 15, 1958
10 14.9 inches ... Jan. 25, 2000
11 14.1 inches ... Dec. 11-12, 1960
12 13.1 inches ... Feb. 11-12, 2006
13 13.0 inches ... Mar. 5-7, 1962
14 12.3 inches ... Jan. 22, 1987
15 12.1 inches ... Jan. 30-31, 1966
16 12.0 inches ... Feb. 16-18, 1900
17 11.9 inches ... Mar. 13-14, 1993
18 11.7 inches ... Feb. 5-8, 1899
19 11.5 inches ... Dec. 17-18, 1932
20 11.5 inches ... Mar. 21-22, 1964
i dont think #1 would even be in the running in rochester.
Old Feb 5, 2010 | 06:26 AM
  #19  
WhrDLMI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Community Organizer
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 101,552
Likes: 4,900
From: Leesburg, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Gigdy,Feb 5 2010, 10:18 AM
yer storms fail
It isn't about the volume of snow. It is about the people here and the lack of equipment/facilities to deal with it all.
Old Feb 5, 2010 | 06:27 AM
  #20  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

Originally Posted by WhrDLMI,Feb 5 2010, 10:23 AM
I'm not allowed. Literally doctor's orders.
Dude, some rules need to be broken. You do know that it is theorized that build-up of semen/lack of ejaculation can be a cause of prostate cancer, right? I'm doing everything I can to do my part to support this theory by being continuously active so as to prevent such a calamity.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:01 AM.