Hello All!!!
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Aiea
Hmmm I hate to say it *Flame suit on* but my RSX seemed faster and had much better trq then the S2k. Maybe it was becuase the rsx is FWD and I could just break the stock tires loose...maybe it wasnt as smooth or something....maybe my RSX just sounded faster....what do you guys think....oh the s2k handles a ton better...and i love the short throw shifting.
-Snuff
-Snuff
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Aiea
Originally posted by smccurry
hmmmm, I thought the exact opposite. The S2000 feels a lot faster to me, whereas the RSX seemed smoother. I think the i-VTEC makes the transition to the larger cams seamless, where the S2000 feels like you've just hit the NOS button (i-VTEC is superior). Of course, you're talking about breaking the tires loose, so I didn't get a chance to do that with the RSX, but I would think that the crappy stock tires on the RSX would be easier to break loose even if it was RWD. The S-02's on the S2k, OTOH, are extremely grippy, though some complain that they are not progressive enough communicating loss of grip at the limit.
hmmmm, I thought the exact opposite. The S2000 feels a lot faster to me, whereas the RSX seemed smoother. I think the i-VTEC makes the transition to the larger cams seamless, where the S2000 feels like you've just hit the NOS button (i-VTEC is superior). Of course, you're talking about breaking the tires loose, so I didn't get a chance to do that with the RSX, but I would think that the crappy stock tires on the RSX would be easier to break loose even if it was RWD. The S-02's on the S2k, OTOH, are extremely grippy, though some complain that they are not progressive enough communicating loss of grip at the limit.
-Snuff
