S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

The Great Swaybar Thread!

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-12-2006, 06:53 PM
  #1  

Thread Starter
 
suterusu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default The Great Swaybar Thread!

OK, so a recent post I just made sparked me to make this thread. The only problem is that unless the materials, bends, thickness at the bends, etc. is known, there isn't any way to tell EXACTLY how much softer or stiffer they are than stock without the designer testing it or doing some hard math. So use the numbers only as a guideline. When available from manufacturer, I have listed how much of a difference in percent compared to stock. Here you go:

Early AP1 ('00-'01):
F: 28.2x5.0mm (P/N: 51300-S2A-003)
R: 27.2x5.3mm (P/N: 52300-S2A-013)

Late AP1 ('02-'03):
F: 26.5x4.5mm (P/N: 51300-S2A-013)
R: 27.2x4.5mm (P/N: 52300-S2A-J01)

Early AP2 ('04-'07):
F: 26.5x4.5mm (P/N: 51300-S2A-023 & -033)
R: 25.4x4.5mm (P/N: 52300-S2A-J02)

Late AP2 ('08-'09)
F: 27.2x5.3mm (P/N: 51300-S2A-S01)
R: 25.4x4.5mm (P/N: 52300-S2A-J02)

CR ('08-'09)
F: 28.6x4.5mm (P/N: 51300-S2A-S11) *same effective stiffness as early AP1 bar, but lighter weight
R: 26.5x4.5mm (P/N: 52300-S2A-S01)

------------------------

Alex:
F: 32.0mm
R: 24.5mm
R: 30.0mm

ASM:
F: 25.4x4.0mm (38% softer)
F: 31.8x3.7mm (28% stiffer)
R: 25.4x3.0mm (31% softer)
R: 30.2x3.5mm (15% stiffer)

Comptech:
F: 162%-278% stiffer (race only 5 position adjustable model)
F: 1.25" (~31.75mm)
R: 1.25" (~31.75mm)

Cusco:
F: 32mm (72% stiffer)
R: 30mm (36% stiffer)

Eibach:
F: 32.0mm 2 position adjustable
R: 29.0mm 2 position adjustable

Gendron:
F: 1.25x0.188" (~31.75x4.76mm) 6 position adjustable
F: 1.25x0.25" (~31.75x6.35mm) 6 position adjustable
F: 1.25" (~31.75mm) 6 position adjustable

Mugen:
F: 25.4mm
F: 31.8mm (discontinued)
R: 25.4mm
R: 30.0mm

Saner:
F: 1.25" (~31.75mm) 3 position adjustable

Spoon:
F: 27x4.8mm
R: 27x4.3mm

ST Suspensions:
F: 28.2mm solid (28% stiffer than AP2)
R: 27.2mm solid (31% stiffer than AP2)

SWIFT:
F: ~26mm (87% stiffer)
R: ~26.5mm (116% stiffer)
*compared to Early AP1 ('00-'01)

Tanabe:
F: 30.4mm
R: 30.4mm

Whiteline:
F: 30.0mm (50% stiffer)

I'm tired, PM me if you'd like to add to this.

-Andrew
The following 4 users liked this post by suterusu:
eckoflyte (07-24-2018), keeptrying56 (12-26-2021), Nfsryder (09-07-2020), Noble (07-23-2018)
Old 01-12-2006, 07:37 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
WindchaserS2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hong Kong/California
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

DAmn the CUSCO is Crazy I wonder how it would handle

Cusco:
F: 32mm (172% stiffer)
R: 30mm (136% stiffer)
Old 01-13-2006, 05:07 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Nickfromny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Endwell, NY
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Gendon?
Old 01-13-2006, 12:20 PM
  #4  

Thread Starter
 
suterusu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

thanks Harry. I only went searching for available bars...I'll see what more I can find if I get a break today...
Old 01-13-2006, 02:39 PM
  #5  

 
Gloffer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Murray, UT
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Saner?
Gendron NOT Grendon
Old 01-13-2006, 03:29 PM
  #6  
Former Moderator

 
Slows2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Mother F'in TN
Posts: 43,961
Received 307 Likes on 285 Posts
Default

The Gendron bar is a splined bar, 1.25" o.d.
It has blade type arms with six adjustment positions.
3 bar sconfigurations available:
1. solid
2. .25" wall thickness
3. .188" wall thickness

The Gendron has several variables to determine stiffness, endlink position and what center bar is used.
Old 01-14-2006, 12:57 PM
  #7  

Thread Starter
 
suterusu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

thank you, I also added the Saner bar...
Old 01-16-2006, 01:16 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
BlackJoker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Does anyone know why Mugen discontinued the larger bar and replaced it with the new one?
Old 01-16-2006, 06:33 PM
  #9  

Thread Starter
 
suterusu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

It looks like the Mugen and ASM sizes are the same (assuming they're solid bars). Since ASM and Mugen work closely together, I wouldn't be suprised if they were identical. Hell, the ASM bars are probably repainted Mugen bars. It wouldn't be the first time ASM called something their own. The Cusco catch tank looks very close to the ASM street catch tank. Just a black bracket.
Old 01-18-2006, 08:17 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
BlackJoker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hecash,Jan 16 2006, 03:35 PM
That's a good question. Send a PM to the King Motor Sports guy, Scott Zellner. He'll know.

My bet is that they were not selling enough of them because the car was not used enough for tracking in the early days in the us. Don't forget, it's a two-part expense. Once you put it on, you'll need better rubber.
Thanks


Quick Reply: The Great Swaybar Thread!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:00 PM.