S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

What are the specs for the stock rear swaybar?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 29, 2001 | 02:08 PM
  #1  
Elistan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default What are the specs for the stock rear swaybar?

I'm looking at the Comptech and Mugen front swaybar, and I'm trying to decided if it's worth anything to get their respective matching rear bars. (Primary focus is road racing.)
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2001 | 02:32 PM
  #2  
4373's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Delray Beach
Default

I can answer your first question, "stock specs";
F: 28.2 x 5.0
R: 27.2 x 5.3

Which combination would render improvement would be determined by your driving style. However, the OE rear with the Mugen 31mm front stabilizer works well for a large cross section of owners.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2001 | 02:56 PM
  #3  
BB AP1's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Toronto/Hong Kong
Default

how about the specs for the comptech sway bar kit??
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2001 | 03:50 PM
  #4  
cdelena's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,210
Likes: 7
From: WA
Default

An experiment that is probably worth trying for road racing is to go with the stock front and the smaller Mugen rear (rather than the Mugen front and the stock rear). The affect should be similar, but maybe better balanced than the heavy front bar which is a technique prompted by autox rules that don
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2001 | 04:26 PM
  #5  
Prolene's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,303
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by cdelena
[B]An experiment that is probably worth trying for road racing is to go with the stock front and the smaller Mugen rear (rather than the Mugen front and the stock rear). The affect should be similar, but maybe better balanced than the heavy front bar which is a technique prompted by autox rules that don
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2001 | 08:34 PM
  #6  
Elistan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

True. However, most of that large cross-section of owners, as far as I can tell, are concerned with staying within SCCA Stock Solo II rules, which prohibits changing the rear swaybar. That isn't a concern for me. So far as I know, there hasn't been anybody out there to modify the rear bar...

Regarding going with just the rear (Mugen's smaller one being 25.4 x 4.5) I'm concerned about loosening things up in general. Balance might be attained, but perhaps that would lower the limits in general?

Any input from somebody who's had experience tuning suspension in such ways?

Thanks,
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2001 | 03:43 AM
  #7  
cdelena's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,210
Likes: 7
From: WA
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Elistan
[B] Regarding going with just the rear (Mugen's smaller one being 25.4 x 4.5) I'm concerned about loosening things up in general.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CrazyRay S2K
S2000 Talk
45
Aug 7, 2006 09:25 AM
Popeye
S2000 Racing and Competition
6
Feb 3, 2004 01:35 PM
jkfox121
S2000 Talk
4
Apr 17, 2003 08:33 PM
QuickS2ilver
S2000 Under The Hood
9
Mar 9, 2003 05:54 PM
jwfisher
S2000 Racing and Competition
2
Mar 30, 2001 03:48 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:39 AM.