S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

X-brace handling characteristics

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 03:21 AM
  #1  
syclone's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Lawton, OK
Default X-brace handling characteristics

when i had the spoon x-brace on the car along with the spoon strut brace, the car was very twitchy.. on corners the back wouldn't slide out, it actually skipped as if i hit a lump on the road and the tires left the ground for a split second..

anybody else experience this problem or know what's causing it? i've removed the x-brace since then.. but also modified the suspension quite a bit and r-comps for auto-x..
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 04:03 AM
  #2  
Triple-H's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 58,680
Likes: 2
From: West Henrietta UPSTATE NY
Default

Sorry, can't say I have ever felt the front become twitchy after adding my X-brace and STB. If anything it became much more stable and steering inputs were more direct/precise feeling.

As far as the rear of the car is concerned I can not comment due to the tremendous amount of additional reinforcement I have added back there.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 04:42 AM
  #3  
Fongu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa
Default

I've had similar experiences, but with stock suspension (2002) with SO2's and RA1's. When at around 7/10'ths cornering on a bumpy sweeping turn, the rear either has a wavy "motion of the ocean" wagging or when pushed a little more, a skipping action. It never happens on a smooth track. The rear end response and oversteer is very predictable and controllable. It doesn't happen or isn't noticable when driving at a normal steet-driven pace.

I'm pretty sure the wavy rear feeling is due to the big rear toe changes that happen on the sudden bumps (i.e. the dreaded bump/roll steer). GoFast Labs has that new rear control arm that reduces the toe change vs. suspension travel that should help this out. I suspect the "skipping" feeling when pushed harder is also caused by sudden toe change with the bump, causing momentary loss of traction, but I'm not sure. Could be some other suspension tuning issue.

IMHO, the stiffening shouldn't be the cause of your issues. All it supposed to do is stiffen the chassis to help the suspension work in a more predictable and stable way. Maybe it is just exposing the inherent suspension geometry or tuning issue you are having with your setup.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 04:48 AM
  #4  
silvershadow's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale
Default

I have a MY 00. At one point, I had an x-brace, a STB and cusco 3-piece bars. With my alignment, I found that combination too sensitive to drive on the street. If you looked to the side, the car would change lanes. I would take off the STB and leave the other bars on for the street, but ran with the STB on (with the other braces) for several auto-x's and it was great.

I have since taken them all off because I run B stock and they are not legal
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 09:58 AM
  #5  
jerrypeterson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,768
Likes: 2
From: Bellevue, WA
Default

If I understand the converstation, you guys actually think STB's or X-Brace's DO something on an S2000?
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 10:14 AM
  #6  
human's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: San Jose
Default

Actually, from my own experience the X-brace definitely does improve the comfort when driving over rough roads on the street. This is even more apparent if your car is lowered. There is a stretch of really rough road that I have to drive through on the way to work every day (Highway 101 in san jose). The X-brace really makes it much more tolerable.

I doubt it does anything on the track though. In fact, it may have possible negative effects for a S2000 with a purely stock. The S2000 engineers may have factored in a certain amout of flex in the chassis when designing the suspension and the X-brace reduces that flex, so the front toe, camber could be different from what the engineers intended it to be.



Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 10:46 AM
  #7  
pantyraider's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 1
From: San Fran
Default

Originally Posted by human,Jul 27 2004, 10:14 AM
Actually, from my own experience the X-brace definitely does improve the comfort when driving over rough roads on the street. This is even more apparent if your car is lowered. There is a stretch of really rough road that I have to drive through on the way to work every day (Highway 101 in san jose). The X-brace really makes it much more tolerable.

I doubt it does anything on the track though. In fact, it may have possible negative effects for a S2000 with a purely stock. The S2000 engineers may have factored in a certain amout of flex in the chassis when designing the suspension and the X-brace reduces that flex, so the front toe, camber could be different from what the engineers intended it to be.
Exactly. I think there is a huge difference on the street where the roads are much less than perfect, especially here in LA. On the track, its iffy, the turn-in is slightly sharper, but thats about it. Really, the x-brace helps on uneven roads.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 11:58 AM
  #8  
jerrypeterson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,768
Likes: 2
From: Bellevue, WA
Default

Originally Posted by human,Jul 27 2004, 11:14 AM
Actually, from my own experience the X-brace definitely does improve the comfort when driving over rough roads on the street. This is even more apparent if your car is lowered. There is a stretch of really rough road that I have to drive through on the way to work every day (Highway 101 in san jose). The X-brace really makes it much more tolerable.

I doubt it does anything on the track though. In fact, it may have possible negative effects for a S2000 with a purely stock. The S2000 engineers may have factored in a certain amout of flex in the chassis when designing the suspension and the X-brace reduces that flex, so the front toe, camber could be different from what the engineers intended it to be.
"IF" such flex exists at OBTAINABLE chassis loads, the suspension geometry would change. It would be pretty damn hard to predict that value. In simplistic terms, when your suspension geometry changes the tires are pointing in directions you didn't originally intend. I think it would be pretty hard to predict the end result there.

IF chassis flex was an issue, and that issue was addressed by the addition of reinforcement, the chassis would theoretically be stiffer. The ride over rough roads would be firmer and even more jarring, it would not be more comfortable.

Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 03:40 PM
  #9  
Fongu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa
Default

Originally Posted by jerrypeterson,Jul 27 2004, 12:58 PM
If I understand the converstation, you guys actually think STB's or X-Brace's DO something on an S2000?
The STB does nothing. The x-brace might have some effect, but doubt it is significant. Was trying to be modder-PC
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 04:25 PM
  #10  
jerrypeterson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,768
Likes: 2
From: Bellevue, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Fongu,Jul 27 2004, 04:40 PM
The STB does nothing. The x-brace might have some effect, but doubt it is significant. Was trying to be modder-PC
If I remember the catchphrase: "VOTA Rules"
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:59 AM.