Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

SSR "Roadster"- Detroit's Latest Ripoff

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 07:49 AM
  #1  
Palmateer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
From: St. Pete, Florida
Default

Does GM really think there are that many loyal GM-car buyers willing to fork over 49 large for this joke of a vehicle? With the mighty 300 hp Vortec V8 that propels it to the quarter mile in only 15.4 sec at 89 mph?

No doubt it will just be a matter of weeks before the SSR will have a multi-thousand dollar rebate slapped on it, as is the case with so many of the other Detroit cars nowadays.

The SSRs will eventually be gathering dust in the showrooms, just like previous Detroit boutique vehicles like the Plymouth Prowler and Ford Thunderbird.



(It looks like the ad maker screwed up and forgot to put 2004 as the model year, but CG says it was intentional.)
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 07:53 AM
  #2  
Fapout's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,416
Likes: 0
From: Kirkwood, MO
Default

I agree with you one hundred percent. I can't imagine that there is that big of a niche for $50,000 compact trucks. For the same price in a few months i highly doubt that they will sell any once the new vette in the showrooms.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 08:10 AM
  #3  
SpeedxRacer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,029
Likes: 3
From: Dallas
Default

I saw one of those in person, it looks plain awful.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 08:32 AM
  #4  
eyescream's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Default

and the weight is not "compact"
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 08:42 AM
  #5  
koala's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,731
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB
Default

Am I the only person that thinks its kind of nice?

BTW, they start at $41,000 US. But still very overpriced.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 08:57 AM
  #6  
rai's Avatar
rai
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,981
Likes: 10
From: mount airy
Default

It NEEDS the Z06 engine bad.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 09:07 AM
  #7  
Sr2oD3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,435
Likes: 0
From: Andromeda
Default

I saw one last weekend on the interstate, with the top up, it's horrible, and I bet with the top down, it still looks like ass.

I am saddened by GM's horrendous try will make them realize that some americans just don't buy anything.

but they will make up for their loss with the new Corvette, even though I'm not a real Corvette fan, I am looking forward to the C6.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jan 24, 2004 | 09:11 AM
  #8  
Solless's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 16,139
Likes: 0
From: North Lake, WI
Default

SSR
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 09:43 AM
  #9  
Popeye's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 21,530
Likes: 17
From: Gleening the apex
Default

It will die the same death as the Prowler only quicker. Had GM brought this out at the same time as the Prowler it might have had some legs but right now it is just a cartoon.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 10:52 AM
  #10  
xviper's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 37,305
Likes: 18
Default

Originally posted by koala
Am I the only person that thinks its kind of nice?

BTW, they start at $41,000 US. But still very overpriced.
Nope! I like it, too. This whole nostalgia thing might be getting a bit worn out, though, but I still like the idea. However, having owned several GM products (some BIG buck ones), I am still NOT convinced that GM can make a reliable, daily driver in the conditions that I would use it. It's priced the way it is simply because they are trying to capitolize on an aging population's desire to get some of their youthful memories back. It IS way overpriced. If it were priced a few grand less than an S2000, it would be put on my list of "to look at". As it stands - ARE THEY NUTS?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:02 PM.