S2000 Street Encounters Stories of on-the-road exploits and encounters.

Odd Runs: Story #3 Out Of 3

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 01:22 PM
  #1  
joeking1978's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
From: Livonia
Exclamation Odd Runs: Story #3 Out Of 3

This was kinda neat... especially considering that these cars... as sharp as they are... have simply became the new ing Taurus! They are a dime a dozen around here!! You can't turn a corner without being blind-sided by 300's with a broader spectrum of drivers then flavors at the Starburst factory!


This one was a dark maroon, and he had already upgraded to some new, kinda cool dark maroon (almost rusty looking) 19's.

He started out in front of me at a light... and with deep throated roar... he was off! I was relatively unexpecting because most in this area treat their new possesion like a thug getting his first Bentley... So by the time I dropped and tried to keep up... he had me by about 3 cars. I caught up quick, and got behind him, half expecting to see him launch again. ...and of course... he did. This time, I was a little more prepared, being in 2nd just shy of Vtec. He still edged me, and I was full bore to keep on his tail.

At the next light, I was able to pull side by side to get an even start. We both creeped out until about 20 and dropped it... being in perfect Vtec, I was able to pull him by about a car and a half this time (with some great shifts) up to 70.

So all in all... for luxury... those hemi's got some good kick...

Next... I want to run the guy a few blocks over who just put his on ing 24's!!! His 300 is jacked up like a ghetto sled fresh with new spokes! ugly... damn ugly...
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 09:38 PM
  #2  
Halo's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area
Default

Funny that you should drop the Bentley analogy because I've wondered if the appeal of the 300 is that it has a Bentley look to it.

'Nways, a co-worker of mine just got one of these and I had a chance to drive it. Pretty impressed. Definitely a long way from some of Chrysler's low points in the 70s and 80s. He really bought into the whole 'hemi' marketing buzz even though he's not a Mopar fanatic and was laying it on a bit thick. I reminded him that I have $50 RC airplane engines with hemispherical combustion chambers so it isn't exactly science fiction technology any more.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 05:58 AM
  #3  
joeking1978's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
From: Livonia
Default

Originally Posted by Halo,Jul 12 2004, 12:38 AM
I reminded him that I have $50 RC airplane engines with hemispherical combustion chambers so it isn't exactly science fiction technology any more.
lol... very true... and a great way to bring him back to reality! As for the hemi though... it does pack some oomph though!
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 10:22 AM
  #4  
joeking1978's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
From: Livonia
Default

wow... I just looked up some dirt on the 300c Hemi... and those are FAST cars! I'm suprised I pulled on him the way I did (although I know the "launch" is the secret to speed- or a lack there of- in the S)


2005 Chrysler 300C Hemi
ACCELERATION, Seconds
Zero to 30 mph, 2.0
40 mph: 2.8
50 mph: 4.1
60 mph: 5.3
70 mph: 6.8
80 mph: 8.8
90 mph: 11.0
100 mph: 13.4
110 mph: 16.1
120 mph: 20.1
Street start, 5-60 mph: 5.6
Top-gear acceleration, 30-50 mph: 2.8
50-70 mph: 3.4
Standing 1/4-mile: 13.9 sec @ 102 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 130 mph

Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 02:01 PM
  #5  
Saud2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,686
Likes: 0
From: kuwait
Default

they look great in the pics but seem to large in person
im surprized too that you kept up!...not broken in? maybe not
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 04:45 PM
  #6  
joeking1978's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
From: Livonia
Default

suprised I kept up? Hell... I'm even more shocked that I pulled. Chances are... #1. Not Broken in... #2. Not 100% confident or knowledgable of how to drive it...

I'm sure when we took off, he didn't know where his best powerband was and that allowed me to get a stronger start...
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 05:43 AM
  #7  
JerryIII's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 933
Likes: 16
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Maybe his aftermarket wheels were heavier than stock and slowed him a bit. Nice kill BTW, I really like the look of the new 300c. The HEMI engine in those cars is quite impressive. The ability the engine has to disengage 4 cylinders at cruising speed is truly innovative and something that I am sure we will see much more of in the future.

Jerry
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jul 13, 2004 | 06:00 AM
  #8  
joeking1978's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
From: Livonia
Default

exactly... takes away the problem people have with big engines... no effeciency...

So now it is big...

Effecient...

and can take us in a straight line...


great...
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 08:12 AM
  #9  
Halo's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area
Default

In the early 80s, Cadillac had a failed attempt at a variable displacement engine, made I think by Eaton. The technology dates back much further than that. The pushrods and lifters still moved, but the valves were closed when the CPU decided it didn't need all 8. Didn't work out too well back then. But, it seems to be the shape of things to come for a number of automakers.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 01:38 PM
  #10  
AirCav Nate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Enterprise
Arrow

Originally Posted by JerryIII,Jul 13 2004, 07:43 AM
The ability the engine has to disengage 4 cylinders at cruising speed is truly innovative and something that I am sure we will see much more of in the future.

Jerry
Actually GM did this with caddy back in the 70's it was a V8 that dropped either to a 6 or 4 cyl depending on engine load, but the tech wasn't quite good enough and it was buggy and not very efficient.

Nate
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:09 PM.