S2000 Street Encounters Stories of on-the-road exploits and encounters.

The ULTIMATE VIDEO- 350z vs. S2000

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 19, 2004 | 04:34 PM
  #1  
joeking1978's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
From: Livonia
Question The ULTIMATE VIDEO- 350z vs. S2000

The Build Up... A background to the source of the video...

As I promised... myself and 3fiddyz wanted to end this ridiculous controversy of what car is faster.

In the process... We had svtmach1 (jsep productions www.jsept.tv) there to film the whole thing

The video itself is amazing! in an hour he cut and edited the whole thing. He could have done more, and we actually intended on having 3 more camera's out there (but just found it to be not necessary for this)...

The setting:
    We did this with my better half about a half mile ahead on cop watch- with radios...

    Aaron- 3fiddyz: 2003 FairladyZ with plenum and intake- slight advantage- BUT... advantage neutralized with 200lbs Camera man

    Joe- Joeking1978: 2002 Suzuka blue S2000- Stock! (with 18" SSR GT1's)
    [/LIST]SUMMARY
        I'm curious to know what people think of the editing of the video... We were actually going to have another car, and a couple more camera's- including some mounts. We were going to then edit and cut multiple angles together... but without the third car... we were incapable... (it would have resulted in camera angles of one car... with camera's in or on it!). We'll probably put more footage like this together... but just for the editing purpose alone. This time, there was some huge fan fair that wanted to see the results of the race... next time, we can do it without even going over the speed limit... (the beuaty of editing )

        The VIDEO
          Fact Vs. Fiction <-- Click Here for VIDEO!!
          Reply
          Old Aug 19, 2004 | 05:44 PM
            #2  
          Vash's Avatar
          Banned
           
          Joined: Feb 2003
          Posts: 2,064
          Likes: 0
          From: Crying
          Default

          nice
          Reply
          Old Aug 19, 2004 | 05:57 PM
            #3  
          DSMRacer's Avatar
          Registered User
           
          Joined: Sep 2003
          Posts: 487
          Likes: 0
          From: Miami
          Default

          Both cars have there advantages and disadvantges, just really depends on where you race them from.

          But very nice video
          Reply
          Old Aug 19, 2004 | 06:48 PM
            #4  
          tenblade2001's Avatar
          Registered User
           
          Joined: Jul 2002
          Posts: 9,280
          Likes: 1
          From: knoxville, TN
          Default

          Joe,
          nice video and you made some good points. BUT, the 18's slow you down and the the Z had an intake (which helps most of all at speed). Overall, good video and explanation.
          Reply
          Old Aug 19, 2004 | 06:58 PM
            #5  
          joeking1978's Avatar
          Thread Starter
          Registered User
          Gold Member (Premium)
           
          Joined: Jul 2003
          Posts: 2,744
          Likes: 0
          From: Livonia
          Default

          to answer both of your topics... those 18's are lighter then stock... and have made no difference in my times (track tested)... with the exception of autocross... they break easier.

          We had both cars dyno'd at the freshwater tour... We found the exact hp that the plenum and intake provided. By calculation... the 200lbs passenger exactly equals the same power to weight ratio...

          plus... we had the EXACT same results in all the times we ran before he had it installed... If he doesn't have a passenger however... he will pull me more easily from a roll then in the video...

          but thanks for the good words!

          (give some props to svtmach1 for filming and editing to though1 )
          Reply
          Old Aug 19, 2004 | 09:13 PM
            #6  
          s2ka's Avatar
          Registered User
           
          Joined: Mar 2003
          Posts: 3,037
          Likes: 26
          From: SoCal
          Default

          The 18's will slow you down due to the larger overall diameter, it's the same as going to taller rear end gears...not a good thing on an S2000. Throw some shorter gears on there and you'll smoke him.

          18" rears on left, stock on right:

          Reply
          Old Aug 19, 2004 | 09:19 PM
            #7  
          GChambers's Avatar
          Banned
           
          Joined: Aug 2002
          Posts: 3,137
          Likes: 0
          From: Indy, In.
          Default

          Originally Posted by joeking1978,Aug 19 2004, 06:34 PM
          Both of us know how to drive- in fact we were 3 and 4 best lap times (me first! -with shitty tires too ) out of 40 at the TireRack's autocross.
          Make that at least 4th and 5th.

          1.Gus Hammerly
          2.Harold Hammerly
          3.Geoff Chambers
          Then the rest....
          Reply
          Old Aug 19, 2004 | 09:42 PM
            #8  
          TriaXenginE's Avatar
          20 Year Member
           
          Joined: Dec 2001
          Posts: 17,505
          Likes: 0
          Default

          Originally Posted by s2ka,Aug 20 2004, 01:13 AM
          The 18's will slow you down due to the larger overall diameter, it's the same as going to taller rear end gears...not a good thing on an S2000. Throw some shorter gears on there and you'll smoke him.
          that's why you get the proper tire with the right aspect ration so it won't screw with the overall rolling diameter.

          who says that all 18" wheels will automatically produce a bigger diameter?
          Reply
          Old Aug 20, 2004 | 04:39 AM
            #9  
          joeking1978's Avatar
          Thread Starter
          Registered User
          Gold Member (Premium)
           
          Joined: Jul 2003
          Posts: 2,744
          Likes: 0
          From: Livonia
          Default

          Originally Posted by GChambers,Aug 20 2004, 12:19 AM
          Make that at least 4th and 5th.

          1.Gus Hammerly
          2.Harold Hammerly
          3.Geoff Chambers
          Then the rest....

          geoff... I don't remember seeing you hit 48?



          ...plus, I consider Gus and Harold one entity... they're like King Ghidora! ...a multi-headed racing maching...

          Reply
          Old Aug 20, 2004 | 04:46 AM
            #10  
          joeking1978's Avatar
          Thread Starter
          Registered User
          Gold Member (Premium)
           
          Joined: Jul 2003
          Posts: 2,744
          Likes: 0
          From: Livonia
          Default

          Originally Posted by TriaXenginE,Aug 20 2004, 12:42 AM
          that's why you get the proper tire with the right aspect ration so it won't screw with the overall rolling diameter.

          who says that all 18" wheels will automatically produce a bigger diameter?
          exactly... ask any tire "expert"... and rolling diameter will lead to a higher centrifugal force if an equal weight... But... if the weight is lessened... then by pure physics... the centrifugal force will be limited too...


          F=mv2/r (force equals MASS x velocity x 2 divided by RADIUS




          And also... WHO MOVED THIS FROM THE GALLERY!!?? wtf!? I put this in there for the video... obviously the story sounds like a street encounter... but you have to give a story to go with the video... there's already a copy IN street encounters... stupid.
          Reply



          All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:37 PM.