S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Advantage of small displacement big hp engine??

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 27, 2001 | 12:40 AM
  #1  
JT-KGY's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
From: Alhambra
Default Advantage of small displacement big hp engine??

What is exactly the advantage???
We all know that Americans like to use big displacement V6 and
V8s... but what's the downside to that??? I used to think that
they must drink gas like crazy... but after some research.. this
is what I found.. (I only look at top performance engines..)

Vette Z06 405hp 400tq 5.7liter 19/28mpg
360 modena 395hp 275tq 3.6liter 10/16mpg
Z8 or M5 394hp 5.0 liter 13/21
01 M3 333hp 262tq 3.2liter 16/24mpg
S2000 240hp 153tq 2.0liter 20/26mpg

Basically.. this is comparing Vette's LS6 engine to the high
specific power representatives of V8, I6 and I4... (well, except
M5's engine)...

So what's the advantage(s)????
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2001 | 12:59 AM
  #2  
awWhHDayUm's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,158
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale
Default

the only advantage I can think about is that the engine is lighter. that's pretty much it. anybody else??
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2001 | 02:38 AM
  #3  
rstark's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
Default

I think those mpg numbers for the corvette are wishful thinking
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2001 | 02:47 AM
  #4  
Wallzy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Default

If you drive a vette like I drive my S, you will be able to watch the fuel pin on the dash board fall like a rock off a cliff, you will literally be able to watch your fuel consumption happen while driving.

Walz
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2001 | 03:13 AM
  #5  
jschmidt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
From: Laurel
Default

I agree, lightness. BTW, horsepower is a much more reliable indicator of fuel milage than engine size.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2001 | 03:28 AM
  #6  
lvs2k's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,959
Likes: 0
From: Bedford
Default

Your mileage may vary . . .
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2001 | 03:34 AM
  #7  
Luis's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: Lisbon
Default

Production costs will be lower, although development costs will probably be higher.

Lower engine torque also means that you can do with lighter, less expensive transmissions, at least for components all the way from the engine to the final gear.

... and from the engineer POV it's a much more exciting endeavour than just throwing displacement at the problem...
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2001 | 06:28 AM
  #8  
hpalmer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Wayne
Default

Small displacement high hp engines are;

Cheaper to make,

Cheaper to maintain, (Hey it's got half the cylinders)

Weigh less, (this reduces cost across the whole car as the suspension components can be smaller and lighter, same goes for the frame, the car as a whole etc, etc.)

Take up less space, (again allowing for a smaller vehicle or a more creative layout)

And on average get better fuel economy.

The numbers for the Vette are based on its massive overdrive 6th gear. The Z06 runs about 2000 rpm at 65mph. It can do this because of the high torque that it has down low.


Hugh
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2001 | 06:42 AM
  #9  
ElTianti's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
From: Rome, GA
Default

Originally posted by rstark
I think those mpg numbers for the corvette are wishful thinking
Wrong! Ask some C5 owners, some of them have see 30mpg on the highway. Granted stop and go will exact a toll, but on the highway the engine is barely above an idle
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2001 | 08:29 AM
  #10  
jschmidt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
From: Laurel
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by ElTianti
[B]
Wrong!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:05 PM.