S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

sportscars (laptimes...)

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 27, 2000 | 09:12 AM
  #1  
swiss2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: Switzerland
Default

here are the laptimes from hockenheim (short course)... the SPORT-AUTO tests every month a sportscar...





the lotus exige (179hp) is only 0.6 sek slower as the diablo GT (575hp)!!




Reply
Old Dec 27, 2000 | 09:33 AM
  #2  
Stealthy_S2K's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
From: Ann Arbor
Default

Hey, Our S2000 beats the Audi S4. Just one thing I am dissapointed is that Boxster S beats our car. It must be that Mid Engine setup. Look, we are not far behind a M5.

also, I noticed the BMW M3 should be a E36 M3. I wonder, will E46 M3 beat that time and ultimatly gets up the top 3 list for that group. then again, that is 3 secs the E46 M3 have to make up to get to Top 3.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2000 | 09:37 AM
  #3  
JMark's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Default

Boxster S beats the S2000 by .6 sec. Not bad for $15000.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2000 | 09:37 AM
  #4  
swiss2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: Switzerland
Default

the M3 ist the brand new 343hp with optinal 19"weels...
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2000 | 10:14 AM
  #5  
Prolene's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,303
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Originally posted by JMark:
Boxster S beats the S2000 by .6 sec.
Just think, with a throttle body upgrade, headers, fuel pressure tuning, perhaps lighter wheels/flywheel, the S2k might even beat the Boxster S, perhaps with just a portion of those mods as well.


Reply
Old Dec 27, 2000 | 10:17 AM
  #6  
Luis's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: Lisbon
Default

I have the issue where they test the S2K against the Boxster S.

The Boxster had the sport pack, 17 inch, wide tyres, etc. So, not 100% fair.

Still, I suspect that the S2000 performance is somewhere between the 2.7 and 3.2 Boxsters. But with a 2.0 engine and thousands of bills to spare.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2000 | 02:59 PM
  #7  
2kturkey's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne!
Default

I'm pretty impressed. The Stook may not be the fastest but it's up there in some pretty exalted company guys.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2000 | 04:55 PM
  #8  
ORIF's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default

Actually our car was bested by the RS4, which is a station wagon variant of the S4! It can haul groceries and some serious a## as well. Unfortunately, this version is not to be imported across the pond.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2000 | 08:31 PM
  #9  
2kturkey's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne!
Default

Originally posted by ORIF:
Actually our car was bested by the RS4, which is a station wagon variant of the S4! It can haul groceries and some serious a## as well. Unfortunately, this version is not to be imported across the pond.
and isn't the M coupe the station wagon version of the M roadster?
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2000 | 08:47 PM
  #10  
swiss2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: Switzerland
Default

Yes, it is.... (in the 321hp europe-version)

Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:28 AM.