Money and Investing Discuss stock picks, portfolios, retirement and other investment related topics.

Walgreens

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 4, 2007 | 06:03 PM
  #1  
clawhammer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 25,683
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
Default Walgreens

Disappointed earnings this week, so the stock went South very fast. $47 -> under $40. I know Cramer doesn't like the stock, but not exactly sure why.

The company has no debt. Their PEG ratio is under 2. Any reason why I shouldn't buy $500 worth at $39.50 or so?
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2007 | 06:31 PM
  #2  
cthree's Avatar
Administrator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,274
Likes: 4
From: Toronto, Canada
Default

Is there a reason why you should?
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2007 | 07:15 PM
  #3  
clawhammer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 25,683
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by cthree,Oct 4 2007, 09:31 PM
Is there a reason why you should?
Sales keeps increasing Calendar year-to-date sales were $40,357,306,000, an increase of 11.9 percent from $36,056,997,000 in 2006.

They keep opening new stores, already have 6,014 drugstores

Revenue is good and is expected to increase, the company has problems with expenses, something that a good management team can take care of.

Consumer will keep buying more and more drugs

The company still has no long-term debt

P/E ratio of 19.53

PEG ratio of 1.17

Is that enough reason? IMO, in the long-term Walgreens will do well. In the next couple of months the stock price may stay fairly flat, but I"m buying it at a bargain compared to last week.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2007 | 07:30 PM
  #4  
cthree's Avatar
Administrator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,274
Likes: 4
From: Toronto, Canada
Default

Beware of value traps.



It's done nothing for 3 years but trade in a range from 40 to 50. YTD it's trading in a $4 range except for the big sell off. If people are jumping ship now are things getting better or worse? The best you can hope for is a 20% gain regardless of how long you hold the stock. I say it's dead money and wouldn't touch it. Some things are "cheap" for a reason.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 03:35 AM
  #5  
clawhammer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 25,683
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by cthree,Oct 4 2007, 10:30 PM
Beware of value traps.



It's done nothing for 3 years but trade in a range from 40 to 50. YTD it's trading in a $4 range except for the big sell off. If people are jumping ship now are things getting better or worse? The best you can hope for is a 20% gain regardless of how long you hold the stock. I say it's dead money and wouldn't touch it. Some things are "cheap" for a reason.
I would be buying the stock hoping for a 20% rally the way it did between May 06 and Sept 06 knowing that if it doesn't rally, it will be a stable long-term stock.

My investment goal is to beat the major indexes. If I'm doing better than the indexes, then I'm doing good in my book.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 05:46 AM
  #6  
cthree's Avatar
Administrator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,274
Likes: 4
From: Toronto, Canada
Default

I only signed up for the 5 minute argument. It was your question and it's your money so do what you want to do.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 07:36 AM
  #7  
trainwreck's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,440
Likes: 1
From: NORCAL
Default

wag and that whole sector is a dog. there a so many other good stocks with much better long term growth. if i was seeking steady long term growth i would pick something with international exposure like nke. it outperforms wag on everychart with plenty of more room to go. nba is increasing their emphasis in china, which means lebron and yao will be doing a lot more chinese commercials!

i am glad i dumped rad for a loss, it was a cancer in the portfolio.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 07:52 AM
  #8  
cthree's Avatar
Administrator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,274
Likes: 4
From: Toronto, Canada
Default

RAD was not one of my better calls.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 12:12 PM
  #9  
trapper's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 14
From: Exeter, NH
Default

Originally Posted by cthree,Oct 5 2007, 10:52 AM
RAD was not one of my better calls.
Mine either ...... I got caught in the "big one" a few years back when they went belly-up.....NEVER again will I get caught like that....... dumb ...!!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chrisjgiuliano
Money and Investing
15
Jul 31, 2008 07:03 PM
Wiggum
Money and Investing
39
Apr 2, 2008 04:56 PM
_Dc
Money and Investing
4
Nov 27, 2007 09:34 PM
Amit
Money and Investing
2
Jul 12, 2007 01:36 PM
martha
Money and Investing
3
May 16, 2007 10:57 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:45 PM.