Hot off the press!
http://www.vtec.net/news/news-item?news_item_id=617521

Edit: I hope the numbers are off because they are claiming 250hp at only 7000 rpm. I hope Honda doesn't abandon the high revving nature that makes the current S so enjoyable...
Edit: I hope the numbers are off because they are claiming 250hp at only 7000 rpm. I hope Honda doesn't abandon the high revving nature that makes the current S so enjoyable...
You just need to work on the 8 year car payment plan like I am! Lease it for 3 years to get the low monthly payment, then finance for 5 years after that
(Yes I AM crazy, thanks for asking!)
(Yes I AM crazy, thanks for asking!)
Priced against Toyota's upcoming Supra? I guess it'll be out of my price-range.
Originally Posted by gladwins,Sep 29 2006, 10:32 AM
I hope the numbers are off because they are claiming 250hp at only 7000 rpm.
Originally Posted by kevkranker,Sep 29 2006, 06:51 AM
250hp wouldn't be bad if it weighs in < 2200lbs. Thats would me more than enough. We will see.
What does that mean for us? More luxury touches, more safety hardware and most likely the option of a slushbox...
I'd place money on the table that the next S2000 will be around 3100lbs... a 300 lb increase.
Originally Posted by gladwins,Sep 29 2006, 11:10 AM
What does that mean for us? More luxury touches, more safety hardware and most likely the option of a slushbox...
I'd place money on the table that the next S2000 will be around 3100lbs... a 300 lb increase.
I'd place money on the table that the next S2000 will be around 3100lbs... a 300 lb increase.
when someone mentions an optional automatic transmission. You don't want an automatic then fine it's optional . . . don't get it. If it means better sales for the S2000 so that the S2000 can continue on then I don't understand what the big deal is.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by MikeyC,Sep 29 2006, 10:16 AM
OK. I really don't understand why when everyone always talks about the future of the S2000 I always see a
when someone mentions an optional automatic transmission. You don't want an automatic then fine it's optional . . . don't get it. If it means better sales for the S2000 so that the S2000 can continue on then I don't understand what the big deal is.
when someone mentions an optional automatic transmission. You don't want an automatic then fine it's optional . . . don't get it. If it means better sales for the S2000 so that the S2000 can continue on then I don't understand what the big deal is.
Sales really ARE down alot this year. We can be snobs about automatics once they actually start building them
Originally Posted by MikeyC,Sep 29 2006, 11:16 AM
OK. I really don't understand why when everyone always talks about the future of the S2000 I always see a
when someone mentions an optional automatic transmission. You don't want an automatic then fine it's optional . . . don't get it. If it means better sales for the S2000 so that the S2000 can continue on then I don't understand what the big deal is.
when someone mentions an optional automatic transmission. You don't want an automatic then fine it's optional . . . don't get it. If it means better sales for the S2000 so that the S2000 can continue on then I don't understand what the big deal is.
That might just make it a "chick car."





