Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Any CPAs who are also CFAs?

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 7, 2005 | 08:40 PM
  #11  
magician's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,592
Likes: 0
From: Yorba Linda, CA
Default

Originally Posted by s2k2004,Sep 7 2005, 07:05 PM
Schedule to take level 1 CFA this December, wish me luck.
Study hard!
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 04:58 AM
  #12  
WVtwisties's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by S2000boi,Sep 7 2005, 07:54 PM
currently an AIS major in my junior year.

any tips on landing a good internship with an auditing firm?
yeah...Know a senior auditor or VP in a big five!
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 05:28 AM
  #13  
Scot's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,288
Likes: 39
From: Nashville
Default

Accounting Nerds!!!!!!!

there seem to be a fair number of CFA's in the world, so it can't be that hard to pass. I passed the CPA exam so it can't be that hard either.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 05:45 AM
  #14  
WVtwisties's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

lots of doctors and lawyers too!!! and that sh1t is hard!!!!!!
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 07:07 AM
  #15  
Harpoon's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,402
Likes: 7
From: Oregon
Default

Originally Posted by magician,Sep 7 2005, 02:18 PM
The pass rates for the 2004 CFA Exams were:

Level I: 32%
Level II: 34%
Level III: 64%

Given that you cannot take the Level II exam till you've passed the Level I, and you cannot take the Level III till you've passed the Level II, the pass rate for all parts the first time would be 0.32 * 0.34 * 0.64 = 0.069, 6.9%. (This assumes that the pass rates are somewhat consistent year-to-year.)
That's incorrect Magician. The Institute does not report pass rates based on whether or not someone is taking the exam level for the first time, second time and so forth. So, you can't just use the rates to figure the odds. This was an exact exam question in the statistics section several years ago - level II I think.

The Institute has reported the actual pass rates - first time successful for all three levels - if I remember correctly it was around 25%.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 07:19 AM
  #16  
magician's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,592
Likes: 0
From: Yorba Linda, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Harpoon,Sep 8 2005, 07:07 AM
The Institute does not report pass rates based on whether or not someone is taking the exam level for the first time, second time and so forth.
True enough. I was simply trying to use available statistics to estimate the pass rate for first-time success on all three exams. There were, as you point out, many assumptions backing that calculation.

Originally Posted by Harpoon,Sep 8 2005, 07:07 AM
The Institute has reported the actual pass rates - first time successful for all three levels - if I remember correctly it was around 25%.
Twenty-five per cent seems quite high. That suggests that people who pass each exam the first time have a better-than-average chance of passing the next exam the first time, and that those who fail an exam once or twice have a better-than-average chance of failing the next exam once or twice.

I passed each of the three exams the first time I took them, which, of course, means nothing other than that I found a method of studying that worked well for me and that I saved a lot of time and money by doing so. It certainly does not mean that I am a better financial analyst than someone who failed one or more exams before passing all three. (Code and Standards: Standard IV(B.6) Prohibition against Misrepresentation)
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 07:42 AM
  #17  
Harpoon's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,402
Likes: 7
From: Oregon
Default

[QUOTE=magician,Sep 8 2005, 07:19 AM]True enough.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 09:25 AM
  #18  
Morris's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,401
Likes: 1,104
From: Napa
Default

Passing exams does not mean you are good at your occupation, as Magician said. I know a person that passed the CPA exam, and could barely operate a 10-key adding machine. That person never did become proficient at a personal computer. Now that person has retired, so you are all safe.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 09:37 AM
  #19  
Scot's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,288
Likes: 39
From: Nashville
Default

When did you retire?

Originally Posted by Morris,Sep 8 2005, 12:25 PM
Passing exams does not mean you are good at your occupation, as Magician said. I know a person that passed the CPA exam, and could barely operate a 10-key adding machine. That person never did become proficient at a personal computer. Now that person has retired, so you are all safe.
I agree...taking exams may mean you are book smart, but that doesn't mean you have any common sense! I know a couple of guys who got like 1300+ on their SAT's who have nearly no street smarts.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 11:32 AM
  #20  
WVtwisties's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

accounting doesn't take street smarts!
a lot of finance doesn't either..maybe the sales portion, if that's your capacity.

I totally agree with the point...passing exams doesn't make you good at your professoin...it's kind of like the guy who's 7 feet tall isn't necessarily a good basketball player. same things with the 300 pound fat ass who sucks at football. Having a high IQ and good test scores does say a lot about a person and in certain fields I'd much rather have that guy working for me than the guy who makes all the right 'street decisions' (whatever that means) but couldn't break 1000 on the SAT's and says was instead of were.

hopefully no one thinks i'm directing this at their comments..this is MO based on nothing else.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:09 PM.