Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

buying a mp3 player

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 07:15 PM
  #1  
emrillive's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
From: usa
Default buying a mp3 player

i am in the market for a mp3 player and am confused about what the differences is between..

a hard drive player
a microdrive player
a flash-based player.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 07:45 PM
  #2  
S2KBobby's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 384
Likes: 30
Default

Well you have the three main types of MP3 players. That is a start.

a hard drive player
This is you typical Ipod player. Usually they have a laptop style hard drive with 5 10 or 20GB of storage. A 20 gig drive will store over 4000 songs so be prepared to spend days loading it.
This would be my choice for carrying ALL of your music but if you want to run or do other physical activities and want a smaller MP3 player you should consider something at 5 gigs or lower.

a microdrive player
This style uses a hard drive but it is much smaller than a laptop drive. The microdrives I am familiar tend to be 4.5 gigs and smaller.
Again the player has to be a minimum size to carry the microdrive.

a flash-based player
The smallest of MP3 players while maintaining removable media is a flash-based player. They usually use flash media cards which can be interchanged at will. Other flash-based players are of a fixed size and don't allow for changing songs away from the computer. The advantage is size. These little buggers are so small they can get lost in a pocket. The disadvantage is that you have to contend with the music you loaded this morning before leaving for the day.

I purchased a 20 gig hard disk unit years ago. It is a RIO RIOT and is a little larger than the 20 gig Ipod. The RIO RIOT had it's share of operating problems that left it unpopular and was perceived unreliable. It was just cranky and works well if you understand the limitations.

If my RIO quit I wouldn't hesitate to look at the new units with picture and movie viewing capability. Size is not an issue and 20 gigs is easily enough storage to carry all my music and most of my pictures to boot.

Good luck with the shopping.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 08:52 PM
  #3  
KRAZYKOREAN's Avatar
Gold Member
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 62
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Umm get the new iPod Nano, thing is tight.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 09:04 AM
  #4  
ninethreeeleven's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
From: The Empire State
Default

Flash based would be the best in terms of stability and quickness of transer, also great size (think nano).

HDD based have moving parts and there for are slower in transfer as well as playback (but only transfer will be noticable).

Microdrive is just a small HDD. Not quicker or slower really, just smaller.

Flash is expensive though, and you can't get huge 60gig sizes (or even 20gig).

The iPod line demonstrate the differences perfectly.
iPod = HDD (I think, but night be micro drive)
iPod Mini = Microdrive
iPod nano and Shuffle = Flash

Color screens and accesories are up to the user. Flash is good because it is not as easy to damage. You basically have to break the whole thing to break the memory. HDD based drives have disks and readers if you hit it very hard it will break internally, although externally it will look fine.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 02:51 PM
  #5  
OCMusicJunkie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 1
From: Orange County
Default

Basically, shoot for a flash player. The Nano has the most capacity of any flash player at 4 gigs, so if you need more, you're going to need a HD or MD player.

The only reason NOT to buy a flash player at this point is capacity. The 4-gig Nano is now the same price my HD-based 4-gig Mini was.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 04:28 PM
  #6  
Austblue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,085
Likes: 0
From: 3rd bedroom on the right
Default

You sure on that junkie? Over here the 4g nano is the same price as the 6g mini.....
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 05:04 PM
  #7  
emrillive's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
From: usa
Default

the nano is awesome looking but the battery life isnt very impressive. 14 hours rated, so in reality it would be like 10 hours of playback time at the most? The later after a couple hundered times of recharging it be more like 5 hours, wouldnt it?
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 05:27 PM
  #8  
emrillive's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
From: usa
Default

if i was to get the nano, the lonly way to get music on it is if i used the itunes right?
i mean i cant transfer existing music i have on my computer right?
in other words i have to download and pay a buck for every song i want on my nano. And all the songs that i have collected so far are useless cause i cant transfer them on the nano?
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 06:14 PM
  #9  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Originally Posted by emrillive,Sep 13 2005, 08:27 PM
if i was to get the nano, the lonly way to get music on it is if i used the itunes right?
i mean i cant transfer existing music i have on my computer right?
in other words i have to download and pay a buck for every song i want on my nano. And all the songs that i have collected so far are useless cause i cant transfer them on the nano?
No, not true.

You can use other apps to load and organize music with an iPod besides iTunes. Check out the forums at www.ilounge.com for great resources of info on players.

You can transfer any existing music onto an iPod. iTunes supports mp3, mp4, aac, protected aac, wav, aiff, and will convert unprotected wma to any of the above formats.

You'd only pay for music you buy off iTunes, not any songs you rip off CDs, get from P2P, already have, etc. iTunes is considered the best player/music store in the market. The iPods are considered the best players on the market.

The latest iPod holds 60GB, and is hard drive based. Its good for carrying around, but not so good for active stuff like running. The plus side is that the regular iPod has a bunch of attachments, so you can add speach recording, speaker, radio, remote accessories, etc.

I have a regular iPod for carting large volumes of music around (for use in places like my car), and a Shuffle for travel and to use a flash drive.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 06:20 PM
  #10  
ninethreeeleven's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
From: The Empire State
Default

Originally Posted by emrillive,Sep 13 2005, 08:04 PM
the nano is awesome looking but the battery life isnt very impressive. 14 hours rated, so in reality it would be like 10 hours of playback time at the most? The later after a couple hundered times of recharging it be more like 5 hours, wouldnt it?
I read a review where they got more than 14 hours out of it. Not much more (like 14 hours 15 minutes) but that is more than Apple said it would do.

I don't have problems like this. I read cell phone reviews where the people are complaining that it only has 14 hours of talk time. 14 hours? Who talks that much between recharges? I think its bragging rights at that point.

With a cell phone I recharge every night, with the nano I recharge while downloading so thats 3 times a day right now.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:10 PM.